Bolja regulativa

This page is also available in:

  • Adopted on 21/09/2022 - Bureau decision date: 07/12/2021
    Reference
    ECO/577-EESC-2022-01290-00-00-re-tra
    Workers - GR II
    Spain
    Diversity Europe - GR III
    Romania
    Evaluation of European Fund for Strategic Investment 2.0
    ECO/577 - Technical annex
  • Adopted on 23/03/2022 - Bureau decision date: 06/07/2021
    Reference
    INT/958-EESC-2021
    Employers - GR I
    Germany

    The purpose of the opinion is to contribute to the further development of the foresight in the EU policy-making so to strengthen the EU's capacity and freedom to act. The opinion should ensure that EESC views are integrated in the new EU policymaking cycle which introduced foresight as a new compass as well as in the next European Commission's Annual Foresight Report. 

    EESC opinion: 2021 Annual Foresight Report
  • Adopted on 23/02/2022 - Bureau decision date: 21/09/2021
    Reference
    NAT/842-EESC-2021
    Diversity Europe - GR III
    Cyprus

    Waste transport can involve hazardous materials that are harmful to human health and the environment. The EU therefore has rules in place on waste shipments (Regulation 1013/2006) and the Commission intends to review the EU rules on waste shipments. 

  • Adopted on 24/03/2021 - Bureau decision date: 28/10/2020
    Reference
    INT/918-EESC-2020-01-01
    Employers - GR I
    Germany

    On 9 September 2020, the European Commission adopted its first annual Strategic Foresight Report, presenting Commission’s strategy to integrate strategic foresight into EU policy-making. Strategic foresight aims to identify emerging challenges and opportunities to better steer the European Union's strategic choices and to inform major policy initiatives. It will support the Commission in designing future-proof policies and legislation that serves both the current needs and longer-term aspirations of European citizens.

     

    EESC opinion: Strategic foresight
  • Adopted on 18/09/2020 - Bureau decision date: 21/01/2020
    Reference
    ECO/506-EESC-2020-01-01-00732
    Workers - GR II
    Austria
    (Italy
    EESC opinion: Economic governance review 2020
  • Adopted on 19/09/2018 - Bureau decision date: 17/04/2018
    Reference
    INT/853-EESC-2018-01-01-02126-00-00-AC-TRA
    (Poland
    (Italy

    The EESC agrees with the European Commission about the need to modernise and simplify EU consumer policy and considers that the new legislative package contributes to bridging the gap created by the exponential growth of e-commerce, undermining consumer confidence and causing distortions to the single market.

    EESC opinion: A New Deal for Consumers
  • Adopted on 18/04/2018 - Bureau decision date: 13/11/2017
    Reference
    INT/838-EESC-2017-06085-00-00-AC-TRA
    (Germany

    The EESC is of the view that the Better Regulation Agenda should become a permanent programme in delivering high-quality Union legislation without undermining key policy objectives or creating deregulation pressure.

    EESC opinion: Completing the Better Regulation Agenda: Better solutions for better results (own-initiative opinion)
  • Adopted on 18/10/2017
    Reference
    /-EESC-2017-01-01-04279-00-00-AC-TRA
    Plenary session number
    529
    -

    The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has requested the Committee's views on whether the steps taken by the European Commission to enforce EU law have addressed European's concerns. The ECA would like to know which specific aspects of the monitoring of the application of the legislation in particular have caught the EESC's attention.

  • Adopted on 21/09/2017 - Bureau decision date: 26/01/2017
    Reference
    INT/817-EESC-2017-01-01-01443-00-00-ac-tra
    Workers - GR II
    France

    Impact assessments of any legislative proposals must be integrated and accorded due importance to the economic, social and environmental dimensions, including for SMEs. The Committee has called for the Parliament, the Council and the European Commission to agree on a common methodology on impact assessments and evaluations, which could also serve as a prompt for the Committee. It is extremely concerned by the findings on the shortcomings of social and environmental impact assessments and the follow-up to consultations. It calls on the Commission to be more transparent and to give fully documented reasons why a particular measure or proposal is or is not to be submitted for impact assessment and/or an ex-post analysis.

  • Adopted on 05/07/2017 - Bureau decision date: 28/03/2017
    Reference
    INT/820-EESC-2017-01-01-01885-00-00-AC-TRA
    (Portugal

    The Committee agrees in principle with the Commission's proposal.

    EESC opinion: Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2010/40/EU as regards the period for adopting delegated acts