Parem õigusloome

This page is also available in

Displaying 11 - 20 of 54


Vastuvõetud arvamused on 21/09/2017

Impact assessments of any legislative proposals must be integrated and accorded due importance to the economic, social and environmental dimensions, including for SMEs. The Committee has called for the Parliament, the Council and the European Commission to agree on a common methodology on impact assessments and evaluations, which could also serve as a prompt for the Committee. It is extremely concerned by the findings on the shortcomings of social and environmental impact assessments and the follow-up to consultations. It calls on the Commission to be more transparent and to give fully documented reasons why a particular measure or proposal is or is not to be submitted for impact assessment and/or an ex-post analysis.

Vastuvõetud arvamused on 18/10/2017
Täiskogu istungjärk: 
529 -
Oct 18, 2017 Oct 19, 2017

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has requested the Committee's views on whether the steps taken by the European Commission to enforce EU law have addressed European's concerns. The ECA would like to know which specific aspects of the monitoring of the application of the legislation in particular have caught the EESC's attention.

EMSK arvamus: Monitoring the application of EU legislation

Vastuvõetud arvamused on 16/09/2015
Täiskogu istungjärk: 
510 -
Sep 16, 2015 Sep 17, 2015

EMSK arvamus: Delegated acts


Better Regulation - presentation 03.03.2015

Vastuvõetud arvamused on 18/04/2018

The EESC is of the view that the Better Regulation Agenda should become a permanent programme in delivering high-quality Union legislation without undermining key policy objectives or creating deregulation pressure.

EMSK arvamus: Completing the Better Regulation Agenda: Better solutions for better results (own-initiative opinion)

Vastuvõetud arvamused on 09/12/2015
Täiskogu istungjärk: 
512 -
Dec 09, 2015 Dec 10, 2015

The EESC expresses its support for the Commission in combating the erosion of Member States' tax bases and unfair tax competition. The Committee in this context endorses the introduction of a CCCTB and is also pleased that the Commission has published a list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions. The EESC goes even further and proposes that EU rules should include sanctions for companies that continue to run their business through tax havens.

EMSK arvamus: Action Plan on Fairer Corporate Taxation


Slideshow DG TAXUD – A Fair and Efficient Corporate Taxation

Vastuvõetud arvamused on 19/09/2018

The EESC agrees with the European Commission about the need to modernise and simplify EU consumer policy and considers that the new legislative package contributes to bridging the gap created by the exponential growth of e-commerce, undermining consumer confidence and causing distortions to the single market.

EMSK arvamus: A New Deal for Consumers