Bedre regulering

This page is also available in

Displaying 11 - 20 of 53

Pages

Vedtaget on 21/09/2016
Reference: 
REX/464-EESC-0000
Plenarforsamling: 
519 -
Sep 21, 2016 Sep 22, 2016

The EESC has played an important role in strengthening an informed civil society debate on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) through a number of TTIP-related opinions, adopted in 2014 and 2015, covering issues such as labour rights, investment protection, impact on SMEs, among others.

It is important under the present circumstances that the EESC, in order to maintain its position as a key civil society player in the TTIP debate, react to the textual proposals for TTIP negotiations on essential topics such as the sustainable development chapter, regulatory cooperation, investment and services. This will have the advantage not only of setting up the EESC position on major negotiating chapters but also of presenting concrete recommendations and pointing out the need to involve civil society in the implementation of those chapters.

The position of the EESC on specific key issues of the TTIP

Vedtaget on 10/12/2014
Reference: 
INT/750-EESC-2014-04458-00-00-AC-TRA
Plenarforsamling: 
503 -
Dec 10, 2014 Dec 11, 2014

One common rule to apply in all Member States can be much simpler and more efficient than a complex web of varying rules. However, the challenge is to keep this legislation simple by making use of withdrawals, amendments and repeals.

Udvalgets udtalelse: REFIT Programme

Vedtaget on 21/01/2017
Reference: 
INT/817-EESC-2017-01443-00-00-ac-tra
Plenarforsamling: 
528 -
Sep 20, 2017 Sep 21, 2017

Impact assessments of any legislative proposals must be integrated and accorded due importance to the economic, social and environmental dimensions, including for SMEs. The Committee has called for the Parliament, the Council and the European Commission to agree on a common methodology on impact assessments and evaluations, which could also serve as a prompt for the Committee. It is extremely concerned by the findings on the shortcomings of social and environmental impact assessments and the follow-up to consultations. It calls on the Commission to be more transparent and to give fully documented reasons why a particular measure or proposal is or is not to be submitted for impact assessment and/or an ex-post analysis.

Udvalgets udtalelse: Transparency, methodology and resources of evaluations

Vedtaget on 18/10/2017
Reference: 
/-EESC-2017-04279-00-00-AC-TRA
Plenarforsamling: 
529 -
Oct 18, 2017 Oct 19, 2017

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has requested the Committee's views on whether the steps taken by the European Commission to enforce EU law have addressed European's concerns. The ECA would like to know which specific aspects of the monitoring of the application of the legislation in particular have caught the EESC's attention.

Udvalgets udtalelse: Monitoring the application of EU legislation

Pages