European Economic
and Social Committee
EESC opinion: Personal data protection
Key points
It is essential to achieve a balance between the two EU Data Protection Law objectives, i.e. to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons and in particular their right to privacy and neither restrict nor prohibit the free flow of personal data between Member States. The main objective of new legislation must be to put in place a legal framework to help achieve both objectives.
The EESC welcomes the Communication and points out that the collection, merging and management of data from multiple sources need to be carefully circumscribed.
Legislation regulating business activity must remain stable and predictable.
A main recurrent concern of stakeholders, particularly multinational companies, is the lack of sufficient harmonisation between Member States' legislation on data protection.
People need to become increasingly aware of the purposes for which their data is collected and the powers they have to control it.
As far as EU citizens and EU employees are concerned, the relevant law within the European Union should be that of the Member State of the data controller, wherever the data is held.
A specific focus on child related privacy issues is needed.
The present definition of sensitive data needs to be clarified as the categories of electronic data about individuals continue to increase.
While acknowledging the sensitivities of inter-state police co-operation, the EESC believes that it is essential that fundamental rights, including personal data protection, receive maximum consideration at all times.
A more consistent application of EU data protection rules is needed across all Member States.
The independence of national data protection authorities needs to be reinforced.
EESC believes that there is a valuable ongoing role for the Article 29 Working Party.
The EESC asks the Commission to consider the establishment of an EU Authority to address the broader societal ramifications of the internet on a 10- to 20-year timescale.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOVEDPUNKTER EØSU: går ind for forslagets indhold, og da udvalget ikke har nogen bemærkninger hertil, har det besluttet at afgive en udtalelse til støtte for det fremsatte forslag.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOVEDPUNKTER: EØSU: glæder sig over, at målet for REPowerEU-planen er at gøre EU uafhængig af russiske gas- og olieforsyninger påpeger, at mange af de problemer, der skal løses nu, kunne have…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuelt og kollektivt egetforbrug af energi som en faktor i kampen for den grønne omstilling og energiomstillingen og for økonomisk og social balance Hovedpunkter EØSU: mener, at de lokale…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Retfærdigheds- og effektivitetshensyn inden for søtransport Hovedpunkter EØSU: understreger, at den grønne omstilling af søfartssektoren skal tage højde for lande-, sektor- og jobspecifikke…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Omstillingen til et langsigtet bæredygtigt transportsystem HOVEDPUNKTER EØSU: mener, at borgerne og erhvervslivet kun vil støtte aktivt op om omstillingen til et transportsystem,…