European Economic
and Social Committee
EESC opinion: Personal data protection
Key points
It is essential to achieve a balance between the two EU Data Protection Law objectives, i.e. to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons and in particular their right to privacy and neither restrict nor prohibit the free flow of personal data between Member States. The main objective of new legislation must be to put in place a legal framework to help achieve both objectives.
The EESC welcomes the Communication and points out that the collection, merging and management of data from multiple sources need to be carefully circumscribed.
Legislation regulating business activity must remain stable and predictable.
A main recurrent concern of stakeholders, particularly multinational companies, is the lack of sufficient harmonisation between Member States' legislation on data protection.
People need to become increasingly aware of the purposes for which their data is collected and the powers they have to control it.
As far as EU citizens and EU employees are concerned, the relevant law within the European Union should be that of the Member State of the data controller, wherever the data is held.
A specific focus on child related privacy issues is needed.
The present definition of sensitive data needs to be clarified as the categories of electronic data about individuals continue to increase.
While acknowledging the sensitivities of inter-state police co-operation, the EESC believes that it is essential that fundamental rights, including personal data protection, receive maximum consideration at all times.
A more consistent application of EU data protection rules is needed across all Member States.
The independence of national data protection authorities needs to be reinforced.
EESC believes that there is a valuable ongoing role for the Article 29 Working Party.
The EESC asks the Commission to consider the establishment of an EU Authority to address the broader societal ramifications of the internet on a 10- to 20-year timescale.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI EESK norāda: tā kā priekšlikuma saturs ir pilnībā pieņemams un attiecībā uz to nav nepieciešami nekādi Komitejas komentāri, Komiteja ir nolēmusi sniegt pozitīvu atzinumu par…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI: EESK uzskata, ka Eiropas KomisijasREPowerEU plāns ir solis pareizajā virzienā, lai panāktu ES neatkarību no Krievijas gāzes un naftas piegādes; norāda, ka daudzas problēmas,…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuālais un kolektīvais enerģijas pašpatēriņš kā faktors, kas veicina zaļo un enerģētisko pārkārtošanos un ekonomisko un sociālo līdzsvaru Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzskata, ka vietējām un…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Apsvērumi par taisnīgumu un efektivitāti jūras transporta jomā Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzsver: lai saglabātu Eiropas konkurētspējas priekšrocības un mazinātu pārejas radītās atšķirības,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Pāreja uz ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu ilgtermiņā GALVENĀS NOSTĀDNES EESK uzskata, ka pilsoņi un uzņēmumi aktīvi pāreju uz ilgtermiņā ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu atbalstīs…