European Economic
and Social Committee
EESC opinion: Personal data protection
Key points
It is essential to achieve a balance between the two EU Data Protection Law objectives, i.e. to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons and in particular their right to privacy and neither restrict nor prohibit the free flow of personal data between Member States. The main objective of new legislation must be to put in place a legal framework to help achieve both objectives.
The EESC welcomes the Communication and points out that the collection, merging and management of data from multiple sources need to be carefully circumscribed.
Legislation regulating business activity must remain stable and predictable.
A main recurrent concern of stakeholders, particularly multinational companies, is the lack of sufficient harmonisation between Member States' legislation on data protection.
People need to become increasingly aware of the purposes for which their data is collected and the powers they have to control it.
As far as EU citizens and EU employees are concerned, the relevant law within the European Union should be that of the Member State of the data controller, wherever the data is held.
A specific focus on child related privacy issues is needed.
The present definition of sensitive data needs to be clarified as the categories of electronic data about individuals continue to increase.
While acknowledging the sensitivities of inter-state police co-operation, the EESC believes that it is essential that fundamental rights, including personal data protection, receive maximum consideration at all times.
A more consistent application of EU data protection rules is needed across all Member States.
The independence of national data protection authorities needs to be reinforced.
EESC believes that there is a valuable ongoing role for the Article 29 Working Party.
The EESC asks the Commission to consider the establishment of an EU Authority to address the broader societal ramifications of the internet on a 10- to 20-year timescale.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
KERNAUSSAGEN: Der EWSA stimmt dem Inhalt des Vorschlags zu und hat keine Bemerkungen dazu vorzubringen und beschloss, eine befürwortende Stellungnahme zu diesem Vorschlag abzugeben.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
KERNAUSSAGEN: Der EWSA: ist der Auffassung, dass der REPowerEU-Plan der Europäischen Kommission ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung ist, um die EU unabhängig Gas und Öl aus Russland zu machen;…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueller und kollektiver Eigenenergieverbrauch als Faktor für die Öko- und Energiewende und das wirtschaftliche und soziale Gleichgewicht Kernaussagen Der EWSA ist der Auffassung, dass die…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Gerechtigkeits- und Effizienzerwägungen im Seeverkehr Kernaussagen Der EWSA betont, dass beim Übergang zu einem grünen Schifffahrtssektor länder-, branchen- und berufsspezifische Merkmale…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Umstellung auf ein zukunftsfähiges Verkehrssystem KERNAUSSAGEN Der EWSA ist der Auffassung, dass Bürger und Unternehmen die Umstellung auf ein zukunftsfähiges Verkehrssystem nur…