European Economic
and Social Committee
Review of the European public procurement legal framework
EESC exploratory opinion at the request of the European Commission on the Review of the European public procurement legal framework
Key points
The EESC:
- agrees that a review of existing EU legislation is necessary to enhance simplification, reduce administrative cost, and support further harmonisation in the single market;
- believes that a sustainable EU procurement policy can go beyond the narrow market failure paradigm, enabling strategic and public welfare-oriented procurement; enshrine social, innovation and environmental criteria as equal objectives; and ensure fair access to public procurement by private operators;
- considers that public contracts must be awarded on the most economically advantageous basis, while emphasising the importance of non-price criteria, e.g., quality, innovation, environmental, sustainability and social considerations, especially workers’ rights and collective agreements;
- calls for a holistic approach towards Services of General Interest (SGI) policies;
- is of the view that public contracts should not be awarded to companies that systematically infringe core workers’ rights or collective agreements that they are bound to;
- considers that, subject to appropriate legal criteria, and while ensuring minimum distortion to competition, the possibility to use in-house procurement for majority-controlled legal entities and direct award should be retained as part of the revision of the EU procurement directives;
- recommends introducing a legal obligation to evaluate the effects of the existing thresholds for public service contracts;
- thinks that public procurement can support a socially just, ecologically sustainable and economically resilient Europe, for the benefit of the common good;
- calls for mandatory price revision clauses to account for wage-related changes in collective agreements and/or labour legislation or inflation, and other relevant factors that affect the execution of a contract, such as energy costs.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings INT/1092
-
Follow-up from the Commission INT/1092
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOVEDPUNKTER EØSU: går ind for forslagets indhold, og da udvalget ikke har nogen bemærkninger hertil, har det besluttet at afgive en udtalelse til støtte for det fremsatte forslag.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOVEDPUNKTER: EØSU: glæder sig over, at målet for REPowerEU-planen er at gøre EU uafhængig af russiske gas- og olieforsyninger påpeger, at mange af de problemer, der skal løses nu, kunne have…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuelt og kollektivt egetforbrug af energi som en faktor i kampen for den grønne omstilling og energiomstillingen og for økonomisk og social balance Hovedpunkter EØSU: mener, at de lokale…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Retfærdigheds- og effektivitetshensyn inden for søtransport Hovedpunkter EØSU: understreger, at den grønne omstilling af søfartssektoren skal tage højde for lande-, sektor- og jobspecifikke…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Omstillingen til et langsigtet bæredygtigt transportsystem HOVEDPUNKTER EØSU: mener, at borgerne og erhvervslivet kun vil støtte aktivt op om omstillingen til et transportsystem,…