European Economic
and Social Committee
Review of the European public procurement legal framework
EESC exploratory opinion at the request of the European Commission on the Review of the European public procurement legal framework
Key points
The EESC:
- agrees that a review of existing EU legislation is necessary to enhance simplification, reduce administrative cost, and support further harmonisation in the single market;
- believes that a sustainable EU procurement policy can go beyond the narrow market failure paradigm, enabling strategic and public welfare-oriented procurement; enshrine social, innovation and environmental criteria as equal objectives; and ensure fair access to public procurement by private operators;
- considers that public contracts must be awarded on the most economically advantageous basis, while emphasising the importance of non-price criteria, e.g., quality, innovation, environmental, sustainability and social considerations, especially workers’ rights and collective agreements;
- calls for a holistic approach towards Services of General Interest (SGI) policies;
- is of the view that public contracts should not be awarded to companies that systematically infringe core workers’ rights or collective agreements that they are bound to;
- considers that, subject to appropriate legal criteria, and while ensuring minimum distortion to competition, the possibility to use in-house procurement for majority-controlled legal entities and direct award should be retained as part of the revision of the EU procurement directives;
- recommends introducing a legal obligation to evaluate the effects of the existing thresholds for public service contracts;
- thinks that public procurement can support a socially just, ecologically sustainable and economically resilient Europe, for the benefit of the common good;
- calls for mandatory price revision clauses to account for wage-related changes in collective agreements and/or labour legislation or inflation, and other relevant factors that affect the execution of a contract, such as energy costs.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings INT/1092
-
Follow-up from the Commission INT/1092
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI EESK norāda: tā kā priekšlikuma saturs ir pilnībā pieņemams un attiecībā uz to nav nepieciešami nekādi Komitejas komentāri, Komiteja ir nolēmusi sniegt pozitīvu atzinumu par…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI: EESK uzskata, ka Eiropas KomisijasREPowerEU plāns ir solis pareizajā virzienā, lai panāktu ES neatkarību no Krievijas gāzes un naftas piegādes; norāda, ka daudzas problēmas,…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuālais un kolektīvais enerģijas pašpatēriņš kā faktors, kas veicina zaļo un enerģētisko pārkārtošanos un ekonomisko un sociālo līdzsvaru Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzskata, ka vietējām un…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Apsvērumi par taisnīgumu un efektivitāti jūras transporta jomā Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzsver: lai saglabātu Eiropas konkurētspējas priekšrocības un mazinātu pārejas radītās atšķirības,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Pāreja uz ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu ilgtermiņā GALVENĀS NOSTĀDNES EESK uzskata, ka pilsoņi un uzņēmumi aktīvi pāreju uz ilgtermiņā ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu atbalstīs…