European Economic
and Social Committee
The interface between chemicals, products and waste legislation (communication)
Key points:
- The Committee welcomes the approach taken by the Commission in exploring systematically the relevant range of options which could help resolve a series of problems identified at the interface between chemical, product and waste legislation.
- The pro-active, long-term view of the type being adopted by the Commission on this matter is commended. The transition process will, inevitably, be of extended duration, but will require constant encouragement to be driven forward and need to take account of ongoing developments in identification and processing technology.
- The occupational health and safety of workers in recycling plants are also at risk without comprehensive action, particularly on dealing with the issue of legacy substances. The provision of comprehensive information to trade unions is therefore essential.
- The full application of the REACH Regulation and other legislation on chemicals already in place should be prioritised. Existing legislation which prevents hazardous chemicals from initial entry to the material cycle is still not being fully used, especially concerning entry into the EU on products from third countries.
- The Committee identifies and advocates further investment in adapted sorting equipment by recycling companies and the consideration of economic and technical support measures in this area.
- The Committee strongly supports the view that better information on the presence, location, and concentration of hazardous chemicals in products and materials recovered from waste can reduce problems encountered by operators in the recovery chain.
Background:
The Circular Economy Action Plan contained the following two-fold objectives to be achieved:
- enabling recycling and improving the uptake of secondary raw materials; and
- substituting substances of concern and, where this is not possible, reducing their presence and improving their tracking.
These two objectives, one stemming from waste policy and the other from chemicals policy, have often been perceived to be in opposition to each other.
The aim of this Communication is to promote a broad discussion in the Union on how the major elements identified at the interface between chemicals, product and waste legislation can be addressed.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK: remdamasis tuo, kad pasiūlymas yra visiškai priimtinas ir kad dėl jo neturi pastabų, nusprendė pateikti palankią nuomonę dėl siūlomo dokumento.
EESRK: ES turi atkreipti dėmesį į socialinį tvarumą
News
Europos ekonomikos ir socialinių reikalų komitetas (EESRK) paragino Europos Komisiją paskelbti ilgai lauktą ataskaitą, kurioje būtų įvertinta galimybė išplėsti ES tvarumo taksonomijos reglamento…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad Europos Komisijos planas „REPowerEU“ yra žingsnis teisinga linkme siekiant, kad ES taptų nepriklausoma nuo Rusijos dujų ir naftos tiekimo; pabrėžia, kad daugelio…
Migrantų instrumentalizavimas ir Ukrainos pabėgėlių krizė verčia persvarstyti migracijos politiką
News
Dėl valstybės remiamo migrantų instrumentalizavimo, kuriuo siekiama destabilizuoti ES, ir dabartinio karo Ukrainoje, sukėlusio precedento neturintį pabėgėlių antplūdį, reikia peržiūrėti Europos…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualus ir kolektyvinis pasigamintos energijos vartojimas kaip žaliosios ir energetikos pertvarkos ir ekonominės ir socialinės pusiausvyros veiksnys Dokumento esmė EESRK mano, kad vietos ir…