European Economic
and Social Committee
Energy crisis – Future measures must be tailored, targeted and transition-proof
The EU's economic system needs structural change and must be adjusted to become more resistant to future external shocks. Main priorities: improving its resilience, efficiency and strategic autonomy.
The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) recommends establishing a "Green triple-T" criterion to assess future interventions in the EU's economic system, so that adopted measures are unquestionably tailored, targeted and transition-proof.
Building on the recommendations of the European Central Bank (ECB), the Committee stresses that untargeted price measures would only prolong the period of elevated inflation in the longer run. Delaying phasing them out might compromise the ECB's ability to achieve its medium-term objectives, resulting in monetary tightening for longer than is otherwise desirable.
According to the EESC opinion on The impact of the energy crisis on the European economy, drawn up by Alena Mastantuono and adopted at the June plenary session, the European Union needs to move beyond emergency fiscal responses and focus on structural changes to allow it to decouple from fossil fuels more quickly.
"We are convinced that the lessons learned from the negative effects of the energy crisis on the EU's economic performance must be reflected in the next policy steps," said Ms Mastantuono.
To ensure its smooth and competitive economic development, the EU needs reliable and secure deliveries of affordable energy based on an integrated energy market with a large share of clean energy, which is resilient and able to face disruptions and shocks.
More generally, the EU lacks a long-term framework for robust financing for implementing the Green Deal and the EESC asks for an adequate framework in order to support measures financing the transition to a climate-neutral economy in a simple and efficient manner.
The energy crisis revealed and identified some of the substantial weaknesses and disruptions in the EU economic system. Its impact on people's lives and business prosperity is still ongoing and this makes it difficult to measure its final overall impact on the economy.
High inflation was the most visible phenomenon of the 2022 economic performance, with a knock-on effect on other elements of the consumer basket and a strong impact on consumption and behaviour.
The very high level of bankruptcy declarations in the EU also shows the seriousness of the situation. For many the situation is financially unsustainable and adds to the already weakened situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Work organisation
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK: remdamasis tuo, kad pasiūlymas yra visiškai priimtinas ir kad dėl jo neturi pastabų, nusprendė pateikti palankią nuomonę dėl siūlomo dokumento.
EESRK: ES turi atkreipti dėmesį į socialinį tvarumą
News
Europos ekonomikos ir socialinių reikalų komitetas (EESRK) paragino Europos Komisiją paskelbti ilgai lauktą ataskaitą, kurioje būtų įvertinta galimybė išplėsti ES tvarumo taksonomijos reglamento…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad Europos Komisijos planas „REPowerEU“ yra žingsnis teisinga linkme siekiant, kad ES taptų nepriklausoma nuo Rusijos dujų ir naftos tiekimo; pabrėžia, kad daugelio…
Migrantų instrumentalizavimas ir Ukrainos pabėgėlių krizė verčia persvarstyti migracijos politiką
News
Dėl valstybės remiamo migrantų instrumentalizavimo, kuriuo siekiama destabilizuoti ES, ir dabartinio karo Ukrainoje, sukėlusio precedento neturintį pabėgėlių antplūdį, reikia peržiūrėti Europos…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualus ir kolektyvinis pasigamintos energijos vartojimas kaip žaliosios ir energetikos pertvarkos ir ekonominės ir socialinės pusiausvyros veiksnys Dokumento esmė EESRK mano, kad vietos ir…