European Economic
and Social Committee
From Foreign Threats to Local Fears: Unpacking the EU’s Democracy Package
In a recent public hearing, the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) examined the European Commission’s Defence of Democracy Package aimed at increasing the transparency of interest representation, reinforcing the resilience of elections and improving civil and civic participation. Representatives of civil society supported the overall spirit of the proposal but raised concerns about the narrow focus of the Directive on foreign influence and its potential repercussions on civic space in Europe.
The package’s centrepiece, a Directive on transparency of interest representation activities carried out on behalf of third countries, garnered mixed reactions. While applauding the aim of increasing transparency, participants of the hearing warned against unintended consequences.
Concerns were voiced about the too vague definition of a number of key legal concepts put forward in the proposed Directive around the issue of “foreign interference”. Participants also warned about the risk of misuse of the Directive by some governments and the impact of such a Directive on the credibility of the EU’s global efforts against foreign agent laws.
A call for a comprehensive approach to transparency
Panellists emphasised the need for caution in approaching the question of transparency, highlighting that while foreign interference was a significant concern that required a unified EU response, a narrow focus on external threats overlooked destabilisation of EU democracies from within, creating a blind spot. Several participants advocated for the EU to refocus its proposal towards the creation of a global transparency register concerning all activities, whatever the source of their funding.
Recommendations lack legal teeth
The two non-binding recommendations included in the package, on inclusive and resilient elections and on civil and civic participation, were generally welcomed by the participants in the hearing. However, they called for stronger legal frameworks at EU and Member State levels to ensure structured participation of all actors of society, including marginalised groups. The late timing of the recommendations, potentially hindering their impact on the upcoming European elections, was also noted.
Looking ahead
The hearing provided a crucial platform for stakeholders to voice their concerns and suggestions on the Defence of Democracy Package and its impact on European democracy. The discussions will inform the EESC’s forthcoming opinion on the package which will be adopted at the 24-25 April plenary session.
Work organisation
Recommended for you
Toghadh Séamus Boland ina Uachtarán ar Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa, agus gheall sé go gcuirfear an tsochaí shibhialta i gcroílár na hEorpa
News
Toghadh Séamus Boland na hÉireann ar an 35ú Uachtarán ar Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa (CESE) le haghaidh an téarma oifige 2025-2028. Is urlabhra riamh anall é do phobail na tuaithe…
CESE, Uachtarántacht na hÉireann agus an fhís choiteann atá acu
News
I ndiaidh na díospóireachta a reáchtáladh le Comhaltaí CESE le linn sheisiún iomlánach mhí Iúil, níl aon dabht faoi ach go bhfuil clár Uachtaránacht reatha an Aontais ag freagairt go mór do na…
#YEYS2022: Ceist na bréagaisnéise pléite ag aos óg na hEorpa agus a dtuairimí ina leith curtha in iúl acu don Leas-Uachtarán Jourová
News
Chuir daltaí meánscoile ó gach cearn den Eoraip ocht gcinn de thograí nithiúla faoi bhráid Leas-Uachtarán an Choimisiúin Eorpaigh um Luachanna agus um Thrédhearcacht, Věra Jourová. Bhí páirt á…
#CivilsocietyforUkraine
News
Cáineann CESE ionradh Rialtas na Rúise ar an Úcráin, ionradh atá gan údar agus gan chúis Rún ó Choiste Eacnamaíoch agus Sóisialta na hEorpa (CESE) maidir leis an gcogadh san Úcráin agus an tionchar…
Eagrán speisialta de CESE info
News
Eagrán speisialta de CESE info atá dírithe ar an Úcráin. Is féidir scéal Tetyana Ogarkova a léamh, bean a chuala fuaim ionradh na Rúise ar dhúiseacht di an 24 Feabhra.