European Economic
and Social Committee
Self-regulation and co-regulation
Key points:
The EESC considers that:
- self-regulation and co-regulation are mechanisms for regulating economic and social relations or commercial practices among the various economic stakeholders; they may be decided spontaneously or be imposed;
- neither the EU treaties nor Member States' constitutions provide any such enabling basis;
- the parameters for recognising these regulatory instruments must be quite clear, as must the principles governing them and their limits as an accessory regulatory instrument in the legal system concerned;
- the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) is an important step in defining the scope of self-regulation and co-regulation at Community level;
- the agreement could usefully be supplemented by a recommendation to the Member States encouraging them to adopt the same principles and precepts at national level. The EESC asks that the proposed revision be referred to it for an opinion.
Other related EESC documents:
- Appendix I to the opinion - List of related EESC opinions
- Appendix II to the opinion - Table on self- and co-regulation examples
- EESC database on European self- and co-regulation
- Other opinions on Better regulation
- Opinion on Adapting RPS acts to Articles 290 and 291 TFEU (INT/723)
-
Opinion on Adapting RPS acts to Article 290 TFEU (INT/719)
-
Information report on Better regulation: implementing acts and delegated acts (INT/656)
- Opinion on Delegated acts (INT/768, ongoing)
Rapporteur´s expert for the opinion on self- and co-regulation: Professor Fabrizio Cafaggi
- Recent publication by Professor Cafaggi: A Comparative Analysis of Transnational Private Regulation: Legitimacy, Quality, Effectiveness and Enforcement (12 June 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2449223
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat
Downloads
-
Better Regulation - presentation 03.03.2015
-
INT/754 - Appendix I - List of related EESC opinions
-
Appendix II - Examples on self- and co-regulation
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOVEDPUNKTER EØSU: går ind for forslagets indhold, og da udvalget ikke har nogen bemærkninger hertil, har det besluttet at afgive en udtalelse til støtte for det fremsatte forslag.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOVEDPUNKTER: EØSU: glæder sig over, at målet for REPowerEU-planen er at gøre EU uafhængig af russiske gas- og olieforsyninger påpeger, at mange af de problemer, der skal løses nu, kunne have…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuelt og kollektivt egetforbrug af energi som en faktor i kampen for den grønne omstilling og energiomstillingen og for økonomisk og social balance Hovedpunkter EØSU: mener, at de lokale…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Retfærdigheds- og effektivitetshensyn inden for søtransport Hovedpunkter EØSU: understreger, at den grønne omstilling af søfartssektoren skal tage højde for lande-, sektor- og jobspecifikke…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Omstillingen til et langsigtet bæredygtigt transportsystem HOVEDPUNKTER EØSU: mener, at borgerne og erhvervslivet kun vil støtte aktivt op om omstillingen til et transportsystem,…