European Economic
and Social Committee
Review of the securitisation regulation
Key points
The EESC:
- calls to support the objectives of the European Commission's proposal;
- recommends that the review of reporting templates include standardised environmental, social and governance (ESG) information;
- recommends to take additional measures to address fundamental weaknesses in the existing financing of the real economy and to develop the EU equity market;
- calls to strike a balance between reducing supply and demand barriers, and financial stability, market integrity and investor protection, and urges to avoid weakening international standards to the extent possible;
- proposes to harmonise the various monitoring, reporting and review clauses to strengthen the analysis of the impact of the review on lending; recommend a fast-track monitoring mechanism for bank supervisors to annuallyassess whether freed-up capital leads to real lending, non-retained securitised assets, or is used as collateral; recommends to shorten to two years the assessment and reporting periods to the European Commission from the ESAs, and include the results in the abovementioned fast-track monitoring mechanism;
- recommends that any legislative review assess whether further measures and conditionalities are needed, given the pressing need to expand alternative financing;
- calls to support the proposals for more coherent, consistent and harmonised supervision;
- requests that some proposals in the package are fine-tuned, i.e reviewing some calibration and definition inconsistencies;
- calls to ensure that the technical proposals to make risk weight floors "risk-sensitive" avoid modelling risk and arbitrage;
- recommends to reverse the waiver for securitisations when a first loss tranche is guaranteed by public entities;
- calls for additional measures to preserve the long-term relationship between lenders and borrowers and ensure transparency; discourages both moving origination to unregulated non-banks, and moving securitisation processes to jurisdictions that allow aggressive tax planning.
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings ECO/681
-
Follow-up from the Commission ECO/681
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je sklenil ta predlog podpreti.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: meni, da je načrt Evropske komisije REPowerEU korak v pravo smer, da bi EU postala neodvisna od oskrbe z ruskim plinom in nafto; poudarja, da bi se bilo velikemu številu težav…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualna in kolektivna lastna poraba energije kot dejavnik v prizadevanjih za zeleni in energetski prehod ter ekonomsko in socialno ravnovesje Glavne točke EESO: meni, da bi morale lokalne…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Vidiki enakosti in učinkovitosti v pomorskem prometu Glavne točke EESO: poudarja, da je treba pri zelenem prehodu ladijskega prevoza upoštevati značilnosti posameznih držav, sektorjev in…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Prehod na dolgoročno trajnostni prometni sistem GLAVNE TOČKE EESO: meni, da bodo državljani in podjetja dejavno podpirali prehod na dolgoročno trajnostni prometni sistem le, če…