European Economic
and Social Committee
Review of the securitisation regulation
Key points
The EESC:
- calls to support the objectives of the European Commission's proposal;
- recommends that the review of reporting templates include standardised environmental, social and governance (ESG) information;
- recommends to take additional measures to address fundamental weaknesses in the existing financing of the real economy and to develop the EU equity market;
- calls to strike a balance between reducing supply and demand barriers, and financial stability, market integrity and investor protection, and urges to avoid weakening international standards to the extent possible;
- proposes to harmonise the various monitoring, reporting and review clauses to strengthen the analysis of the impact of the review on lending; recommend a fast-track monitoring mechanism for bank supervisors to annuallyassess whether freed-up capital leads to real lending, non-retained securitised assets, or is used as collateral; recommends to shorten to two years the assessment and reporting periods to the European Commission from the ESAs, and include the results in the abovementioned fast-track monitoring mechanism;
- recommends that any legislative review assess whether further measures and conditionalities are needed, given the pressing need to expand alternative financing;
- calls to support the proposals for more coherent, consistent and harmonised supervision;
- requests that some proposals in the package are fine-tuned, i.e reviewing some calibration and definition inconsistencies;
- calls to ensure that the technical proposals to make risk weight floors "risk-sensitive" avoid modelling risk and arbitrage;
- recommends to reverse the waiver for securitisations when a first loss tranche is guaranteed by public entities;
- calls for additional measures to preserve the long-term relationship between lenders and borrowers and ensure transparency; discourages both moving origination to unregulated non-banks, and moving securitisation processes to jurisdictions that allow aggressive tax planning.
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings ECO/681
-
Follow-up from the Commission ECO/681
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
KLJUČNE TOČKE EGSO: prihvaća sadržaj prijedloga i smatra da njegov komentar nije potreban, te je odlučio o njemu dati pozitivno mišljenje.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
KLJUČNE TOČKE: EGSO: smatra da je plan REPowerEU Europske komisije korak u pravom smjeru prema neovisnosti EU-a o ruskoj opskrbi plinom i naftom; ističe da su se mnogi problemi koje sada treba…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Pojedinačna i kolektivna potrošnja vlastite energije kao čimbenik u borbi za zelenu i energetsku tranziciju te gospodarsku i socijalnu ravnotežu Ključne točke EGSO: smatra da bi lokalne i…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Pitanja pravednosti i učinkovitosti u pomorskom prijevozu Ključne točke EGSO: naglašava da se zelenom tranzicijom sektora pomorskog prijevoza moraju uzeti u obzir značajke specifične za pojedinu…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Prelazak na dugoročno održiv prometni sustav KLJUČNE TOČKE EGSO: smatra da će građani i poduzeća aktivno podupirati prelazak na dugoročno održiv prometni sustav samo ako njegova…