European Economic
and Social Committee
Review of the securitisation regulation
Key points
The EESC:
- calls to support the objectives of the European Commission's proposal;
- recommends that the review of reporting templates include standardised environmental, social and governance (ESG) information;
- recommends to take additional measures to address fundamental weaknesses in the existing financing of the real economy and to develop the EU equity market;
- calls to strike a balance between reducing supply and demand barriers, and financial stability, market integrity and investor protection, and urges to avoid weakening international standards to the extent possible;
- proposes to harmonise the various monitoring, reporting and review clauses to strengthen the analysis of the impact of the review on lending; recommend a fast-track monitoring mechanism for bank supervisors to annuallyassess whether freed-up capital leads to real lending, non-retained securitised assets, or is used as collateral; recommends to shorten to two years the assessment and reporting periods to the European Commission from the ESAs, and include the results in the abovementioned fast-track monitoring mechanism;
- recommends that any legislative review assess whether further measures and conditionalities are needed, given the pressing need to expand alternative financing;
- calls to support the proposals for more coherent, consistent and harmonised supervision;
- requests that some proposals in the package are fine-tuned, i.e reviewing some calibration and definition inconsistencies;
- calls to ensure that the technical proposals to make risk weight floors "risk-sensitive" avoid modelling risk and arbitrage;
- recommends to reverse the waiver for securitisations when a first loss tranche is guaranteed by public entities;
- calls for additional measures to preserve the long-term relationship between lenders and borrowers and ensure transparency; discourages both moving origination to unregulated non-banks, and moving securitisation processes to jurisdictions that allow aggressive tax planning.
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings ECO/681
-
Follow-up from the Commission ECO/681
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI EESK norāda: tā kā priekšlikuma saturs ir pilnībā pieņemams un attiecībā uz to nav nepieciešami nekādi Komitejas komentāri, Komiteja ir nolēmusi sniegt pozitīvu atzinumu par…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI: EESK uzskata, ka Eiropas KomisijasREPowerEU plāns ir solis pareizajā virzienā, lai panāktu ES neatkarību no Krievijas gāzes un naftas piegādes; norāda, ka daudzas problēmas,…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuālais un kolektīvais enerģijas pašpatēriņš kā faktors, kas veicina zaļo un enerģētisko pārkārtošanos un ekonomisko un sociālo līdzsvaru Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzskata, ka vietējām un…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Apsvērumi par taisnīgumu un efektivitāti jūras transporta jomā Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzsver: lai saglabātu Eiropas konkurētspējas priekšrocības un mazinātu pārejas radītās atšķirības,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Pāreja uz ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu ilgtermiņā GALVENĀS NOSTĀDNES EESK uzskata, ka pilsoņi un uzņēmumi aktīvi pāreju uz ilgtermiņā ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu atbalstīs…