You are here

Ad hoc groups & Sub-committees - Related Opinions

Displaying 11 - 20 of 38

Pages

Priimtos on 18/10/2017
Nuoroda: 
SC/48-EESC-2017-01690-00-00-AC-TRA
Plenarinė sesija: 
529 -
Oct 18, 2017 Oct 19, 2017

This Committee opinion, prepared in response to the commission's request, has taken stock of the views of European stakeholders on how EU policies and regulatory action can use sustainable economic models to transition successfully towards economic modernisation by reconciling economic prosperity and efficiency, social inclusion and environmental responsibility.

EESC opinion: New sustainable economic models

Downloads: 

Presentation of Arthur ten Wold, Manager of De Groene Zaak

Presentation of Leon de Graaf, Advisor environmental and climate policy, BusinessEurope

Presentation of Aileen Koerfer, Services Policy Officer UNIEuropa

Presentation of Diego Isabel La Moneda, Global Hub for the Common Good

Priimtos on 18/10/2017
Nuoroda: 
SC/47-EESC-2016

This own-initiative opinion is a joint proposal of the two EESC bodies with a cross cutting and horizontal approach: the SDO and the Europe 2020 Steering Committee (SC).

EESC opinion: The transition towards a more sustainable European future

Priimtos on 18/10/2017
Nuoroda: 
/-EESC-2017-04279-00-00-AC-TRA
Plenarinė sesija: 
529 -
Oct 18, 2017 Oct 19, 2017

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has requested the Committee's views on whether the steps taken by the European Commission to enforce EU law have addressed European's concerns. The ECA would like to know which specific aspects of the monitoring of the application of the legislation in particular have caught the EESC's attention.

EESC opinion: Monitoring the application of EU legislation

Rengiamos (updated on 01/03/2019)
Nuoroda: 
/-EESC-2017-EESC-2017-05706-00-00-PAC-TRA
Plenarinė sesija: 
530 -
Dec 06, 2017 Dec 07, 2017

Statute and funding of European political parties and foundations

Priimtos on 18/09/2012
Nuoroda: 
SC/35-EESC-2012-1374
Plenarinė sesija: 
483 -
Sep 18, 2012 Sep 19, 2012

"The opinion is therefore based on the realisation that the handicap beleaguering Europe now is not so much delays in building its internal market as the need to establish a strong economic, industrial and technological identity in the context of globalisation. The EESC believes that discussion therefore needs to consider all the costs of non-Europe resulting from the failure to complete European integration.

The approach advocated in the opinion seeks to reduce costs, optimise expenditure, maximise opportunities and provide an appropriate response for meeting current challenges and finding a positive way out of the crisis which will benefit everyone.
"...

Pages