European Economic
and Social Committee
Revision of the EU action plan against wildlife trafficking
Background
Wildlife trafficking is a lucrative criminal activity worth up to EUR 20 billion annually globally, with illegal trade growing due to being considered a low-risk, high-return activity. Despite having comprehensive legal protection for wildlife, the EU is an important market and transit platform for illegally traded wildlife. The EU has made efforts to raise awareness and fight wildlife trafficking with the EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking in 2016, but demand for illegal wildlife products in the EU has not changed. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a decline in reported seizures, but it does not necessarily indicate a shift in demand or changes in illegal wildlife trade dynamics. The EU is also a source region for some endangered species, and not all illicit wildlife entering Europe is destined for European markets, with the EU often acting as a staging post.
Key points:
In the opinion, the EESC:
- is pleased with the Commission's commitment to allot financial and human resources from EU funds to address wildlife trafficking. However, it stresses the importance of determining the percentage of funds allocated to wildlife trafficking and monitoring and evaluating their execution at the national level;
- highlights the significance of implementing effective and discouraging measures against wildlife trafficking, suggesting that the current level of sanctions proposed by the Council under the Environmental Crime Directive is insufficient and must be increased
- recommends the establishment of consistent structures in all Member States, such as inter-agency committees, specialized units or staff trained to combat wildlife trafficking, and dedicated channels for communication and cooperation with social partners and civil society.
The full text of the opinion is available here.
Additional information
Section: Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment (NAT)
Opinion number: NAT/874
Opinion type: Optional referral
Rapporteur: Ozlem YILDIRIM (Workers - GR II / France)
Co-rapporteur: Cillian LOHAN (Civil society organisations' group / GR III / Ireland)
Reference: COM(2022) 707 final – 2022/0413 (CNS)
Date of adoption by section: 09/03/2023
Result of the vote: 56 in favour/ 0 against / 0 abstentions
Date of adoption in plenary: 26/03/2023
Result of the vote: 152 in favour/ 0 against / 1 abstention
Contacts
Katerina Serifi, Press Officer
Tel.: + 32 2 546 9175, email: Aikaterini.Serifi@eesc.europa.eu
Caroline VERHELST, Administrator, Policy Officer
Tel.: +32 2 546 94 97, email: Caroline.Verhelst@eesc.europa.eu
Work organisation
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK: remdamasis tuo, kad pasiūlymas yra visiškai priimtinas ir kad dėl jo neturi pastabų, nusprendė pateikti palankią nuomonę dėl siūlomo dokumento.
EESRK: ES turi atkreipti dėmesį į socialinį tvarumą
News
Europos ekonomikos ir socialinių reikalų komitetas (EESRK) paragino Europos Komisiją paskelbti ilgai lauktą ataskaitą, kurioje būtų įvertinta galimybė išplėsti ES tvarumo taksonomijos reglamento…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
DOKUMENTO ESMĖ EESRK mano, kad Europos Komisijos planas „REPowerEU“ yra žingsnis teisinga linkme siekiant, kad ES taptų nepriklausoma nuo Rusijos dujų ir naftos tiekimo; pabrėžia, kad daugelio…
Migrantų instrumentalizavimas ir Ukrainos pabėgėlių krizė verčia persvarstyti migracijos politiką
News
Dėl valstybės remiamo migrantų instrumentalizavimo, kuriuo siekiama destabilizuoti ES, ir dabartinio karo Ukrainoje, sukėlusio precedento neturintį pabėgėlių antplūdį, reikia peržiūrėti Europos…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individualus ir kolektyvinis pasigamintos energijos vartojimas kaip žaliosios ir energetikos pertvarkos ir ekonominės ir socialinės pusiausvyros veiksnys Dokumento esmė EESRK mano, kad vietos ir…