Ad hoc groups & Sub-committees - Related Opinions

Pages

Displaying 21 - 30 of 38
Pieņemtie on 14/12/2012
Atsauce: 
/-EESC-2012-2235

The EU needs to enhance the growth part of its overall strategy. This must be based on combining what the Member States can do at national level with action at EU level, anchoring these efforts in the Europe 2020 strategy and in our new governance structures.

EUR/004 - Action for stability, growth and jobs

Pieņemtie on 18/09/2012
Atsauce: 
SC/35-EESC-2012-1374
Plenārsesija: 
483 -
Sep 18, 2012 Sep 19, 2012

"The opinion is therefore based on the realisation that the handicap beleaguering Europe now is not so much delays in building its internal market as the need to establish a strong economic, industrial and technological identity in the context of globalisation. The EESC believes that discussion therefore needs to consider all the costs of non-Europe resulting from the failure to complete European integration.

The approach advocated in the opinion seeks to reduce costs, optimise expenditure, maximise opportunities and provide an appropriate response for meeting current challenges and finding a positive way out of the crisis which will benefit everyone.
"...

Cost of non-Europe

Pieņemtie on 22/02/2012
Atsauce: 
/-EESC-2012-497

The Committee's opinion, prepared in view of the Spring European Council, comments on the Commission’s ‘Annual growth survey’ (AGS) 2012.

In the first part, it deals with general issues related to the AGS such as: its focus on growth, on fiscal consolidation and on the implementation of reforms agreed in the framework of the European semester as well as the implication of organised civil society and social partners in the AGS process.

The second part brings together specific contributions from various EESC opinions that were adopted in 2011 in relation to the five AGS priorities: pursuing differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation; restoring normal lending to the economy; promoting growth and competitiveness; tackling unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis; and modernising public administration. These comments update the EESC’s position on the AGS 2011 that was adopted in March 2011.

Annual growth survey 2012

Downloads: 

EESC opinion on the AGS / Avis CESE sur l'Examen annuel de croissance

Pieņemtie on 15/03/2011
Atsauce: 
/-EESC-0000
Plenārsesija: 
470 -
Mar 15, 2011 Mar 16, 2011

"The Committee fully supports the Europe 2020 Strategy as well as the progress towards ex ante fiscal policy coordination in the European Semester and hopes that, at least for countries in the euro area, the current legislative proposals for European economic policy coordination will be the first step towards a genuine common economic policy and the full coordination of fiscal policies. ..."

Annual Growth Survey

Downloads: 

ces544-2011_ac_lv

Pieņemtie on 15/03/2011
Atsauce: 
/-EESC-0000
Plenārsesija: 
470 -
Mar 15, 2011 Mar 16, 2011

"The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) expresses its solidarity with the people of the southern Mediterranean countries who are peacefully struggling for their fundamental rights and freedoms, and supports their legitimate aim of establishing stable democracies in their countries. ..."

Resolution on The situation in the southern Mediterranean countries

Downloads: 

Resolution on The situation in the southern Mediterranean countries

Pieņemtie on 16/07/2015
Atsauce: 
SC/40-EESC-2015-02021-00-00-AC-TRA
Plenārsesija: 
509 -
Jul 01, 2015 Jul 02, 2015

The aim of this own-initiative opinion is to assess the existing methods of stakeholder consultation carried out by the European Commission in accordance with Article 11(3) TEU. On the basis of this assessment, the opinion sets out proposals that are intended to be constructive and realistic, with a view to structurally enhancing and monitoring the consultation process in the interest of all parties.

Evaluation of European Commission stakeholder consultations

Pieņemtie on 23/10/2014
Atsauce: 
SC/39-EESC-2014-3600

The Europe 2020 strategy's main problems can be seen in the areas of governance, the targets set, civil society participation and its implementation. The architecture of the strategy's governance has formalised a structural distortion in which economic aspects take precedence over social and environmental governance, subordinating the Europe 2020 targets to the macro-economic priorities of the European Semester. It is worrying that the Europe 2020 strategy does not involve organised civil society adequately, at either national or European level.

 

EESC opinion on Taking stock of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth

Downloads: 

speech-mr-palmieri-before-the-502-plenary-session

Pages