European Economic
and Social Committee
EU approach on Integrated Wildfire Risk Management
Key points
The EESC:
- welcomes the Commission Communication on integrated wildfire risk management, recognising the increasing severity and frequency of wildfires in the European Union;
- considers, however, that more priority needs to be given to the dimension of prevention and that there is a structural imbalance between prevention and firefighting policies, and therefore calls on the Commission to substantially strengthen the pillar of prevention; calls for a dedicated wildfire prevention fund to be established in the next MFF that is strictly independent of the CAP budget;
- stresses that the lack of profitability of agricultural (grazing, cultivation) and forestry activities is a key factor in land abandonment, contributing to fuel accumulation and increasing the risk and intensity of fires, and therefore considers it essential to incorporate this economic dimension into European policies;
- notes that much of the areas affected by fires is publicly‑owned land, including protected areas and uncultivated land, which highlights the need to increase Member States’ responsibilities and strengthen their management mechanisms;
- points to the urgent need for a common European wildfire strategy, with particular focus on the southern regions of Europe, ensuring a coordinated, integrated approach with sufficient financial resources and with a focus on means of self-protection and training for rural and wildland owners and workers, utilising dual-use equipment such as irrigation reservoirs;
- highlights the economic, environmental, social and territorial impact of wildfires, which disproportionately affect rural areas, jeopardising territorial cohesion, employment and the viability of agricultural and forestry activities, and the achievement of environmental targets;
- stresses that wildfires have a direct impact on the EU’s climate objectives, including decarbonisation, causing significant carbon emissions and destroying natural sinks;
- highlights the damage wildfires cause to biodiversity through habitat destruction, species loss and ecosystem degradation, undermining environmental resilience and the EU’s nature protection objectives;
- considers that the rules on forest management need to be revised in order to remove constraints that may hinder active and preventive forest management, particularly in the regions most prone to fires, while ensuring that wildlife population management is adapted to local conditions.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI EESK norāda: tā kā priekšlikuma saturs ir pilnībā pieņemams un attiecībā uz to nav nepieciešami nekādi Komitejas komentāri, Komiteja ir nolēmusi sniegt pozitīvu atzinumu par…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI: EESK uzskata, ka Eiropas KomisijasREPowerEU plāns ir solis pareizajā virzienā, lai panāktu ES neatkarību no Krievijas gāzes un naftas piegādes; norāda, ka daudzas problēmas,…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuālais un kolektīvais enerģijas pašpatēriņš kā faktors, kas veicina zaļo un enerģētisko pārkārtošanos un ekonomisko un sociālo līdzsvaru Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzskata, ka vietējām un…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Apsvērumi par taisnīgumu un efektivitāti jūras transporta jomā Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzsver: lai saglabātu Eiropas konkurētspējas priekšrocības un mazinātu pārejas radītās atšķirības,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Pāreja uz ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu ilgtermiņā GALVENĀS NOSTĀDNES EESK uzskata, ka pilsoņi un uzņēmumi aktīvi pāreju uz ilgtermiņā ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu atbalstīs…