European Economic
and Social Committee
A new impetus for the European sustainable finance framework
Key points
The EESC:
- assesses how the EU’s sustainable finance framework can be made more robust and fit for purpose given its importance for the EU’s economic, social and climate objectives;
- affirms that simplification should not come at the cost of ambition. While administrative streamlining is needed, the focus should be on how requirements can be implemented more effectively, not on weakening standards;
- urges EU institutions to ensure that the Omnibus packages support the sustainable finance framework while facilitating company compliance as a positive component. Changes to the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) should not undermine the EU’s ability to scale up sustainable investment and meet the European Climate Law targets;
- finds that this framework has improved transparency, but this is not enough to drive the necessary systemic shifts. Adapting requirements around transition plans and changing due diligence obligations should not threaten the integrity of the framework. Some of the changes of the Omnibus packages could put it at risk;
- urges the Commission and Parliament to maintain ambition and ensure coherence across the sustainable finance architecture;
- at the same time supports efforts to make reporting requirements more proportionate, particularly for SMEs;
- reiterates its call for a sustainable finance framework that addresses the full environmental, social and governance (ESG) spectrum, and is willing to take its part in the design of minimum social safeguards and to implement a social taxonomy;
- highlights the need for a framework that properly accounts for the full spectrum of risk associated with unsustainable activities. This includes recognising the social costs of such actions;
- calls for clearer definitions of key sustainability concepts. This includes through the formal recognition of transition finance as a distinct part of the EU’s sustainable finance agenda;
- calls for the new legislative framework for sustainable finance to make it easier for SMEs and social economy enterprises to meet their requirements;
- believes that collective savings instruments, such as occupational pension plans, must be strengthened as a solid source of sustainable investment;
- calls on the EU and Member States to reaffirm their financial and political commitment to the sustainability agenda. Adequate fiscal space must be preserved for green and social investment.
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings ECO/668
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI EESK norāda: tā kā priekšlikuma saturs ir pilnībā pieņemams un attiecībā uz to nav nepieciešami nekādi Komitejas komentāri, Komiteja ir nolēmusi sniegt pozitīvu atzinumu par…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI: EESK uzskata, ka Eiropas KomisijasREPowerEU plāns ir solis pareizajā virzienā, lai panāktu ES neatkarību no Krievijas gāzes un naftas piegādes; norāda, ka daudzas problēmas,…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuālais un kolektīvais enerģijas pašpatēriņš kā faktors, kas veicina zaļo un enerģētisko pārkārtošanos un ekonomisko un sociālo līdzsvaru Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzskata, ka vietējām un…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Apsvērumi par taisnīgumu un efektivitāti jūras transporta jomā Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzsver: lai saglabātu Eiropas konkurētspējas priekšrocības un mazinātu pārejas radītās atšķirības,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Pāreja uz ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu ilgtermiņā GALVENĀS NOSTĀDNES EESK uzskata, ka pilsoņi un uzņēmumi aktīvi pāreju uz ilgtermiņā ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu atbalstīs…