European Economic
and Social Committee
The economics of an "EU Blue deal"
Key points
The EESC:
considers access to safe, clean and quality water a fundamental right and finds it totally unacceptable that there are still people who have no access to water in the EU;
is calling for:
adapting basic economic concepts such as market rules, economic viability or productivity to take into account the multilateral values of water;
coherent legislation in all Member States on an EU mechanism for storing water during wet periods;
water prices across Member States to be evaluated in accordance with the 'polluter pays principle';
a rationalisation of water consumption through the implementation of the following measures:
price differentiation between consumption for domestic use and essential public services, and consumption for productive use;
a pricing system that effectively discourages unsustainable consumption while incentivising consumption for productive purposes;
a long-term strategy to increase resilience against water scarcity;
investments in working conditions, quality jobs and training and specific activities in this field, especially targeting the younger generation.
the design of the price to include a minimum requirement of free water to ensure human rights;
ensuring full transparency of the costs and price of water towards all stakeholders;
public planning exclusively at a river basin level (including underground water) in such a way that the EU general interest is protected;
increased complementarity between European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), the Recovery and Resilience Facility, InvestEU, Interreg Europe and other funds;
a dedicated operational programme for water and for Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) for the blue economy;
water sectors to be recognised as a strategic priority in the 2028-2034 programming period and, where relevant, a dedicated operational programme for water;
establishing a Blue Transition Fund.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI EESK norāda: tā kā priekšlikuma saturs ir pilnībā pieņemams un attiecībā uz to nav nepieciešami nekādi Komitejas komentāri, Komiteja ir nolēmusi sniegt pozitīvu atzinumu par…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI: EESK uzskata, ka Eiropas KomisijasREPowerEU plāns ir solis pareizajā virzienā, lai panāktu ES neatkarību no Krievijas gāzes un naftas piegādes; norāda, ka daudzas problēmas,…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuālais un kolektīvais enerģijas pašpatēriņš kā faktors, kas veicina zaļo un enerģētisko pārkārtošanos un ekonomisko un sociālo līdzsvaru Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzskata, ka vietējām un…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Apsvērumi par taisnīgumu un efektivitāti jūras transporta jomā Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzsver: lai saglabātu Eiropas konkurētspējas priekšrocības un mazinātu pārejas radītās atšķirības,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Pāreja uz ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu ilgtermiņā GALVENĀS NOSTĀDNES EESK uzskata, ka pilsoņi un uzņēmumi aktīvi pāreju uz ilgtermiņā ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu atbalstīs…