Usvojeno on 16/12/2004
Referentni dokument:
SOC/174-EESC-2004-1655Rapporteur:
Bloch-Lainé (Diversity Europe - GR III / France)
Plenarno zasjedanje:
413 -
Dec 15, 2004 Dec 16, 2004
Starije osobe
Displaying 11 - 20 of 32
Pages
Usvojeno on 13/12/2007
Referentni dokument:
SOC/277-EESC-2007-1711Referral:
COM(2007) 244 finalRapporteur:
Plenarno zasjedanje:
440 -
Dec 12, 2007 Dec 13, 2007
Usvojeno on 13/03/2008
Referentni dokument:
SOC/293-EESC-2008-501Rapporteur:
Plenarno zasjedanje:
443 -
Mar 12, 2008 Mar 13, 2008
Usvojeno on 18/09/2008
Referentni dokument:
SOC/308-EESC-2008-1524Rapporteur:
Plenarno zasjedanje:
447 -
Sep 17, 2008 Sep 18, 2008
Usvojeno on 10/07/2014
Referentni dokument:
SOC/509-EESC-2014-2354Referral:
COM(2014) 167 finalRapporteur:
Co-rapporteur:
Plenarno zasjedanje:
500 -
Jul 09, 2014 Jul 10, 2014
The EESC stresses that occupational pension schemes, created as a result of decisions by the social partners, can play a very important role in ensuring that employees have additional pension provision. The EESC disagrees with the approach to IORPs purely as financial market institutions, which fails to acknowledge their important social function. A one-size-fits-all approach is not the right way of achieving the Commission's objectives given the numerous differences between pension schemes in Member States.
Usvojeno on 15/07/2010
Referentni dokument:
SOC/367-EESC-2010-972Rapporteur:
Plenarno zasjedanje:
464 -
Jul 14, 2010 Jul 15, 2010
Usvojeno on 13/07/2016
Referentni dokument:
TEN/584-EESC-2016Rapporteur:
Plenarno zasjedanje:
518 -
Jul 13, 2016 Jul 14, 2016
Usvojeno on 14/07/2010
Referentni dokument:
SOC/382-EESC-2010-977Rapporteur:
Plenarno zasjedanje:
464 -
Jul 14, 2010 Jul 15, 2010
Usvojeno on 21/10/2010
Referentni dokument:
SOC/389-EESC-2010-1377Referral:
COM(2010) 462 finalRapporteur:
Co-rapporteur:
Plenarno zasjedanje:
466 -
Oct 19, 2010 Oct 21, 2010
Usvojeno on 25/01/2017
Referentni dokument:
SOC/542-EESC-01902-00-04-acRapporteur:
Krawczyk (Employers - GR I / Poland), Bischoff (Workers - GR II / Germany), Jahier (Various interests - GR III / Italy)
Plenarno zasjedanje:
522 -
Jan 25, 2017 Jan 26, 2017
The EESC adopted this opinion after in-depth work carried out during the four meetings of the study group. The opinion also reflects the national debates with civil society organisations carried out in all Member States between 2 September and 2 November 2016. These discussions were coordinated by three members of the EESC ('trios') from the country concerned, often in cooperation with the European Commission (15 debates) or the national economic and social council (7 debates). Participants came from a wide range of employers' and trade union organisations and other civil society organisations, as well as, to a lesser extent, from the academic world. A total of 116 EESC members and nearly 1,800 representatives of civil society organisations participated in the 28 debates. The conclusions/recommendations of the national debates have been grouped in the opinion, while the reports on the national debates will be published separately.
Downloads: