Opinions with Civil Society Organisations - Group III members as rapporteur/co-rapporteur/rapporteur-general

  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 22/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    SOC/555-EESC-2016-05262-00-00-ac-tra
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Malta

    The EESC is pleased that the Maltese Presidency has chosen "High quality education for all" as an priority theme. However, the EESC fears that the value of this initiative could be lost when austerity measures still apply to many of our societies, hindering them to fully benefit from high quality education. Europe should not forget the essential role played by high quality education for all in building up a European society committed to upholding fundamental rights and values.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: High-quality education for all
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 22/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 17/02/2016
    Reference
    SOC/537-EESC-2016-00747-00-01-ac-tra
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Poland

    The EESC advocates the creation of an integrated European fund to combat poverty and social exclusion, based on the experiences of the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) and the European Social Fund (ESF). The current use of the ESF and the FEAD in the Member States should be monitored more effectively and the process should involve civil society organisations. Member States should make greater use of global grants and regranting, and treat in-kind contributions on an equal footing with financial contributions. A greater share of the resources allocated to operational programmes should be earmarked for projects with smaller budgets. The EESC is ready to develop – in cooperation with CSOs – a consultation platform to ensure better coordination of ESF and FEAD interventions and to enable discussion on the basic principles of a future integrated EU fund.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: The effectiveness of ESF and FEAD funding as part of civil society efforts to tackle poverty and social exclusion under the Europe 2020 strategy (own-initiative opinion)
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 22/02/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    REX/478-EESC-2016
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Romania

    The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) believes that the European Agenda on Migration should be designed so as to take into full consideration the humanitarian dimension of its scope, and the EU should not forget its fundamental commitments and legally binding rules to protect lives and human rights, especially of people in danger. The EESC supports the vision to provide a long-term response to migration, addressing the root causes of migration and creating a dialogue with third countries based on cooperation and shared responsibility. Tailored and specific agreements with each country, with full respect of human rights are also supporter. Flexibility provides the right perspective and combination of actions and incentives.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: Establishing a new Partnership Framework with third countries under the European Agenda on Migration
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 25/01/2017 - Bureau decision date: 20/09/2016
    Reference
    SOC/548-EESC-2016-05234-00-00-ac
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Germany

    The Committee supports the European Commission proposal for the creation of a Union Resettlement Framework and calls for a genuine common asylum policy that respects European values. It calls for the common criteria for resettlement to focus on people's need for protection, not on the third country's effective cooperation on asylum and it considers the "first country of asylum" and "safe third country" concepts to be open to question due to the current unsafe and unstable situation in the third countries and regions concerned. The Committee calls for the resettlement programme to be uncoupled from partnership agreements that aim to encourage third countries to prevent refugees from fleeing, as this carries the risk of infringing international law and fundamental rights.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: EU Resettlement Framework
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 14/12/2016 - Bureau decision date: 21/01/2016
    Reference
    NAT/682-EESC-2016-EESC-2016-00801-00-00-AC-TRA
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Finland
    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: The main underlying factors that influence the CAP post-2020 (own-initiative opinion)
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 14/12/2016 - Bureau decision date: 24/05/2016
    Reference
    REX/469-EESC-2016
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Ireland

    Development responses to forced displacement should be tailored for each geographic region, whilst ensuring joined-up action across the European Commission and other institutions. While a development-led approach can produce considerable results with the current budget, the need for extra resources should not be ruled out. Civil society, end users, development partners and NGOs should be involved in the delivery and in making the Commission's Communication operational. Social and civil dialogue structures and processes should be enhanced and improved in partner and host countries to assist with its delivery. Entrepreneurship in the affected regions should be supported and developed as a viable development path for many forcibly displaced people. Education and training responses should be based on a lifelong learning approach. The possibility of making EU programmes available to forcibly displaced people should be considered.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: Lives in Dignity: from Aid-dependence to Self-reliance
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 14/12/2016 - Bureau decision date: 12/07/2016
    Reference
    ECO/413-EESC-2016-04486-00-00-ac-tra
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Italy
    (Austria

    The EESC welcomes and supports the Commission's initiative to anticipate the review of the Regulations on European venture capital funds (EuVECA) and European social entrepreneurship funds (EuSEF). The EESC believes that such a regulation can promote the establishment of a capital markets union. The EESC suggests that in order to expand participation in such investment funds, the hitherto very restrictive access criteria, as well as other restrictive conditions, to be significantly relaxed; the Committee proposes to increase the involvement of non-institutional investors and considers it equally important to create an environment in which the financing objectives of social investment funds can develop.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: Regulation amending the European Venture Capital Fund (EuVECA) and European Social Entrepreneurship (EuSEF) Fund regulations
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 14/12/2016
    Reference
    SOC/547-EESC-2016-04410-00-00-ac
    Workers - GR II
    Spain
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    Romania

    In this opinion the EESC supports further harmonisation of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) and welcomes the proposed improvements. However, it is concerned about some limitations of fundamental rights of asylum seekers. It sets out specific recommendations on the three proposals for: the Qualification Regulation, the Common Procedure Regulation and the Standards of Reception Directive, taking into account the human rights perspective, in line with the opinion on CEAS Reform I.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: Common European Asylum System Reform Package II
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 14/12/2016 - Bureau decision date: 21/01/2016
    Reference
    INT/784-EESC-2016-00975-00-00-AC-TRA
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    France

    In this opinion, the EESC calls for society to begin an economic transition from over-exploitation of resources and a throw-away culture to a more sustainable, job-rich era, based on quality rather than quantity. In order to cope with the fundamental shift to a new economic model with major systemic consequences in many areas, it is recommended that a new cross-cutting and permanent body be set up in the EESC to analyse these developments.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: The functional economy (own-initiative opinion)
  • Tuairimí a glacadh on 14/12/2016 - Bureau decision date: 21/01/2016
    Reference
    NAT/685-EESC-2016-1333
    Civil Society Organisations - GR III
    France

    "Nudges" are small, cheap, easily implemented solutions drawing from behavioural sciences to help people modify their individual behaviours. They consist in inducing towards the most reasonable or responsible option, without forbidding anything, through soft cognitive signals in a wide range of fields, including sustainability. This opinion looks at how to encourage nudging approaches at the European level.

    Download — Tuairim ó CESE: Towards applying Nudge Thinking to EU Policies (own-initiative opinion)