European Economic
and Social Committee
Euro area economic policy 2018 (additional opinion)
Press release: EESC gives European Parliament, Commission and Council fresh input for improving economic governance in the EU
Key points:
The EESC
- agrees with the aims of the Council Recommendation and some of its proposals, but expresses its disagreement with the proposal for a neutral aggregate fiscal stance of the euro area, as well as with the way the recommendation on salaries is formulated;
- believes the economic policy of the euro area should be designed as part of a project to reform EMU by overcoming shortcomings in its structure and functioning, and expresses concern about the paralysis in the reform process;
- believes the Council recommendations should be part of a general economic policy strategy that uses as reference the 2030 Agenda, the SDGs and the Paris Agreement;
- favours a positive fiscal stance for the euro area through investment spending in surplus countries;
- believes the EU and Member States must make a greater commitment to the fight against poverty and inequality and to increased social cohesion, in particular by providing adequate funding for the European Pillar of Social Rights;
- considers that the effort to limit unit labour costs should not come from reducing or freezing wages, but from an increase in productivity;
- believes that wages need to be determined by the social partners and that the European Semester should reinforce collective bargaining or introduce it where it does not exist;
- believes additional measures must be taken to raise the lowest wages and reduce precariousness suffered by young people in particular;
- believes favourable environments for business investment and innovation should be promoted, in particular when dealing with the digitalisation of economic activities;
- reiterates that Banking Union and Capital Markets Union are very important for financing economic activity, and expresses concern about the delays and obstacles in developing Banking Union;
- believes European authorities should commit effectively to the fight against misappropriation of public funds, tax fraud and aggressive tax planning, money laundering, tax havens and unfair tax competition between Member States.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
HOVEDPUNKTER EØSU: går ind for forslagets indhold, og da udvalget ikke har nogen bemærkninger hertil, har det besluttet at afgive en udtalelse til støtte for det fremsatte forslag.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
HOVEDPUNKTER: EØSU: glæder sig over, at målet for REPowerEU-planen er at gøre EU uafhængig af russiske gas- og olieforsyninger påpeger, at mange af de problemer, der skal løses nu, kunne have…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuelt og kollektivt egetforbrug af energi som en faktor i kampen for den grønne omstilling og energiomstillingen og for økonomisk og social balance Hovedpunkter EØSU: mener, at de lokale…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Retfærdigheds- og effektivitetshensyn inden for søtransport Hovedpunkter EØSU: understreger, at den grønne omstilling af søfartssektoren skal tage højde for lande-, sektor- og jobspecifikke…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Omstillingen til et langsigtet bæredygtigt transportsystem HOVEDPUNKTER EØSU: mener, at borgerne og erhvervslivet kun vil støtte aktivt op om omstillingen til et transportsystem,…