Opinions with Workers' Group members as rapporteur/co-rapporteur/rapporteur-general

Pages

Displaying 1 - 10 of 713
Aviz în curs de adoptare (updated on 17/09/2021)
Referințe: 
SOC/693-EESC-2021
Sesiune plenară: 
563 -
Sep 22, 2021 Sep 23, 2021

The EESC is deeply aware of the horror of human trafficking and the harmful consequences for its victims and supports all measures to fight and eradicate it. It supports the intention to establish minimum standards at EU level that criminalise the networks involved in trafficking and exploiting human beings, and the use of services arising from the exploitation of trafficking victims. The EESC proposes that involvement of CSOs and social partners be incorporated into the Strategy and that these organisations be properly supported.

Avizul Secțiunii CESE: EU Strategy on Combatting Trafficking in Human Beings 2021-2025

Aviz în curs de adoptare (updated on 17/09/2021)
Referințe: 
INT/940-EESC-2021-02482-00-00-AC-TRA
Sesiune plenară: 
563 -
Sep 22, 2021 Sep 23, 2021

The EESC is pleased that the proposal puts health, safety and fundamental rights at its centre and is global in scope. In line with its long advocated "human-in-command" approach to AI, the EESC strongly recommends that the AIA provide for certain decisions to remain the prerogative of humans.

Avizul Secțiunii CESE: Regulation on artificial intelligence

Aviz în curs de adoptare (updated on 16/09/2021)
Referințe: 
SOC/694-EESC-2021
Sesiune plenară: 
563 -
Sep 22, 2021 Sep 23, 2021

This opinion provides with the EESC's views on the new EU Strategy on voluntary return and reintegration, a key objective under the New Pact on Migration and Asylum. The EESC welcomes the strategy as a management tool that seeks to improve coordination and Member States' shared objectives in the field of migration governance. It also agrees with the Commission's approach of further reviewing and harmonising the existing instruments, in order to, among other things, improve the fragmented approach to the issue, reduce the costs of return and increase the funding allocated to programmes. The EESC however continues to hold the view that the strategic weakness of the European Union's immigration and asylum policy is its almost exclusive focus on tackling irregular situations, whether at the border or through voluntary and forced returns.

Avizul Secțiunii CESE: Sustainable voluntary return and reintegration strategy

Aviz în curs de adoptare (updated on 16/09/2021)
Referințe: 
SOC/686-EESC-2021
Sesiune plenară: 
563 -
Sep 22, 2021 Sep 23, 2021

This opinion seeks to analyse the impact of the emergency measures aimed at limiting unemployment, supporting income and helping businesses, with a particular focus on the SURE instrument. The EESC considers SURE as a positive and innovative financial instrument which delivers on European solidarity to preserve jobs, provide income support to workers and support businesses, as well as a tool for integration and socio-economic resilience in the EU.  It is proposed that a SURE observatory is set up for as long as the financial instrument is in operation, involving the social partners and other civil society organisations. The EESC also fully acknowledges the positive results of SURE highlighted in the Commission's report of March 2021 and endorses the proposal for its stabilisation in support of workers and businesses as a tool for the EU's integration and socio-economic resilience in times of crisis such as the current one.

Avizul Secțiunii CESE: Emergency measures to support employment and income during the pandemic crisis (own-initiative opinion – Gr II)

Aviz în curs de adoptare (updated on 16/09/2021)
Referințe: 
SOC/685-EESC-2021
Sesiune plenară: 
563 -
Sep 22, 2021 Sep 23, 2021

This opinion, based on a referral by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the EU, aims at presenting the key elements of sustainable quality work during and after recovery. The EESC considers quality of work as one of the fundamental components of quality of life. The principle of quality of work for quality of life must be followed, as this is a prerequisite for sustainable social development. The EESC therefore firmly believes that it should be given special attention in EU policies, as it must prevent the risks of inequality, poverty, social exclusion and unfair competition. The EESC notes that the Recovery and Resilience Facility does not directly address the components of quality work, and therefore calls on the Commission to supplement this part of the facility. Vulnerable groups, such as precarious and young workers, who have been hit hardest by the epidemic, should not be overlooked.

 

Avizul Secțiunii CESE: Key components of sustainable quality work during and after recovery

Aviz în curs de adoptare (updated on 16/09/2021)
Referințe: 
NAT/823-EESC-2021
Sesiune plenară: 
563 -
Sep 22, 2021 Sep 23, 2021

The upcoming Slovenian Presidency of the EU has requested the Committee to draw up an exploratory opinion on the effective achievement of the Directive’s objectives in practice, on Member States’ best practices in regulating the agri-food chain, as well as on the steps needed so that this process does not come to a halt.

Avizul Secțiunii CESE: Towards a Fair Food Supply Chain

Aviz în curs de adoptare (updated on 15/09/2021)
Referințe: 
ECO/559-EESC-2021
Sesiune plenară: 
565 -
Dec 08, 2021 Dec 09, 2021

Notă de informare: Renewed sustainable finance strategy

Downloads: 

Presentation SF Strategy - Sustainable Finance package - EESC informal meeting_24.08.2021

Presentation from DG Fisma : Strategy for Financing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy

Aviz în curs de adoptare (updated on 15/09/2021)
Referințe: 
ECO/550-EESC-2021
Sesiune plenară: 
563 -
Sep 22, 2021 Sep 23, 2021

Member States prepared their recovery and resilience plans that set out a coherent package of reforms and public investment projects. To benefit from the support of the Facility, these reforms and investments should be implemented by 2026.

Avizul Secțiunii CESE: The role of cohesion policy in combatting inequalities in the new programming period after the COVID-19 crisis. Complementarities and possible overlaps with the RRF and the national recovery plans (Own-initiative opinion)

Pages