European Economic
and Social Committee
Energy storage as systemically important infrastructure for a sovereign, affordable and resilient European Energy Union
Key points
The EESC:
considers energy storage necessary to ensure the energy transition is feasible, affordable, socially fair, and territorially balanced. Yet, the EU lacks a related comprehensive strategy;
calls on the Commission to present common guidelines and strategies on:
integrating storage plans into NECPs and ensuring the development of storage, proportional to the development of renewable energy sources;
producing and importing critical materials without creating new dependencies;
battery storage system maintenance, life extension, reuse and recycling;
integrating storage into policies for decentralised solutions, energy communities and vulnerable consumers;
interconnecting storage with the digitalisation and cybersecurity of energy infrastructure, including resilience against cyberattacks and hybrid threats as well as planning of new data centers, based on criteria including the availability of grid capacity, energy efficiency, flexibility, security of supply and the fair allocation of costs;
welcomes the Commission’s announcement that the scope of the current National Escape Clause for defence spending could be broadened to reduce the dependence on imported fossil fuels, thereby contributing to Europe’s security and defence; and the possibility this creates to use this additional flexibility to invest in storage technology and green energy infrastructure;
considers that market-based investment alone will not deliver the necessary scale, timing and type of storage. This makes public strategic planning, complementary public funding, European Investment Bank support, regulated markets, public ownership, regulated asset models, public-community partnerships, regulatory frameworks and long-term investment models essential;
stresses that energy storage infrastructure forms part of services of general interest and should be treated accordingly, including through planning and funding instruments and, where appropriate, public ownership or control;
calls for EU storage policies to support quality job creation, upskilling, technical education and social dialogue. The EU needs to link technological progress to high labour and social standards.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI EESK norāda: tā kā priekšlikuma saturs ir pilnībā pieņemams un attiecībā uz to nav nepieciešami nekādi Komitejas komentāri, Komiteja ir nolēmusi sniegt pozitīvu atzinumu par…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
SVARĪGĀKIE ASPEKTI: EESK uzskata, ka Eiropas KomisijasREPowerEU plāns ir solis pareizajā virzienā, lai panāktu ES neatkarību no Krievijas gāzes un naftas piegādes; norāda, ka daudzas problēmas,…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individuālais un kolektīvais enerģijas pašpatēriņš kā faktors, kas veicina zaļo un enerģētisko pārkārtošanos un ekonomisko un sociālo līdzsvaru Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzskata, ka vietējām un…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Apsvērumi par taisnīgumu un efektivitāti jūras transporta jomā Galvenās nostādnes EESK uzsver: lai saglabātu Eiropas konkurētspējas priekšrocības un mazinātu pārejas radītās atšķirības,…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Pāreja uz ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu ilgtermiņā GALVENĀS NOSTĀDNES EESK uzskata, ka pilsoņi un uzņēmumi aktīvi pāreju uz ilgtermiņā ilgtspējīgu transporta sistēmu atbalstīs…