Cooperare administrativă

This page is also available in

Displaying 1 - 10 of 62

Pages

Aviz adoptat on 17/03/2016
Referințe: 
ECO/392-EESC-2015-05877-00-00-ac-tra
Sesiune plenară: 
515 -
Mar 16, 2016 Mar 17, 2016

The euro area needs to step up its external representation. This will strengthen its relative weight in international financial institutions and give it a more prominent position in international financial markets. The EESC endorses the rationale behind the two Commission documents and agrees with the main elements of the three-phase scenario to gain a single euro area chair at the IMF by 2025. At the same time, however, the EESC proposes that the Commission also draft scenarios for making stronger and more effective the links with other relevant international bodies, taking particular account of their remits. The EESC also recommends clearly and explicitly defining the roles of euro area external representation and their dovetailing with those of the EU as a whole, with a view to preserving the integrity of the single market.

EESC opinion: Euro area external representation

Aviz adoptat on 19/09/2018
Referințe: 
ECO/478-EESC-2018-3925-00-00-AC-TRA

EESC opinion: Establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting for the period 2021-2027 (the ‘Pericles IV programme')

Aviz adoptat on 27/04/2017
Referințe: 
ECO/427-EESC-2017-00342-00-01-ac-tra
Sesiune plenară: 
525 -
Apr 26, 2017 Apr 27, 2017

The EESC supports the Commission's proposal to expand the scope of controls and the competency of the authorities in order to conduct checks and confiscate goods, whenever there is a reasonable indication of illicit activities. The EESC recommends to improve cooperation, both between the competent authorities and between Member States and suggests that penalties should be harmonised across Member States and communicated to the Commission in a coherent way. The Committee also proposes that, in addition to gold, other "highly liquid commodities" should be included in the definition of cash from the moment the new regulation is adopted and it draws attention to the threat of further use of pre-paid cards by criminals and terrorists to covertly finance their activities.

EESC opinion: Terrorism Financing – Controls of cash movements

Aviz adoptat on 28/04/2016
Referințe: 
ECO/405-EESC-2016-01284-00-00-AC-TRA
Sesiune plenară: 
516 -
Apr 27, 2016 Apr 28, 2016

The EESC has in numerous opinions urged for a fair, efficient and growth-friendly corporate tax system, based on the principle that companies should pay taxes in the country where profits are generated. Thus, the Committee welcomes the Commission’s initiatives intended to combat aggressive tax planning and broadly supports the proposed measures as regards the essential elements of the two legislative proposals, the Anti-Tax-Avoidance-Directive as well as the Directive on Administrative Cooperation. It advocates for a more precise scope and framework in certain specific areas (such as e.g. the switch-over clause). The Committee urges to finish drawing up the list of countries or regions which refuse to apply good governance standards and considers that the envisaged legislative measures should not apply to SMEs.

EESC opinion: Anti-tax-avoidance package

Aviz adoptat on 17/07/2019
Referințe: 
ECO/491-EESC-2019-00699
Sesiune plenară: 
545 -
Jul 17, 2019 Jul 18, 2019

The EESC supports the Commission's ambition to kick-start a necessary debate, given the sensitivities of Qualified Majority Voting (QMV) in tax matters. At the same time, the EESC considers that there are certain conditions that would need to be met for QMV to be successfully implemented. The EESC is aware that tax policy has always been closely linked to the sovereignty of Member States, as it is of utmost importance to them.

Following in-depth economic, social and fiscal analysis, any new rule must be fit-for-purpose and all Member States must at all times have sufficient possibilities to participate in the decision-making process. Creating an advantageous outcome both at the EU level and at the level of the individual Member State should be the ultimate objective.

 

EESC opinion: Taxation – qualified majority voting

Pages