The EESC welcomes the Green Paper, because of the contribution that mHealth can make to European healthcare systems, which are facing increasing challenges as a result of demographic change.
The Committee considers that the priority must be to improve healthcare, not to cut costs. The success of mHealth requires the participation of healthcare professionals, dialogue with patient organisations, the promotion of mutual trust between patients and professionals and the provision of incentives and training plans for the latter. Dialogue also needs to be established with industry in this field.
Download — EU framework on "mHealth" and "health and wellbeing applications"
The EESC has frequently noted the importance of broadband access and acknowledges the progress made in increasing its share in the EU.
But the Committee is deeply worried about the persisting digital divide between EU citizens. This gap is not closing for reasons relating to factors including education, age, the high price of IT, the fact that most information is in English, and differences between rural, urban and island regions.
The digital society must not be an additional cause for exclusion. The EESC particularly wants to see EU-wide measures to ensure that people with disabilities have access and enjoy equal conditions in relation to new technologies.
Download — Digital society: access, education, training, employment, tools for equality
The Communication of the Commission presents an EU Quality Framework for Anticipation of Change and Restructuring (QFR). It follows on from the Green Paper ‘Restructuring and anticipation of change: what lessons from recent experience’ of 17 January 2012 and the request made by the European Parliament on 15 January 2013 in its Resolution on information and consultation of workers, anticipation and management of restructuring based on Article 225 of the TFEU (known as the Cercas Report).
Download — Communication establishing a Quality Framework for Restructuring and anticipation of change
The EESC stresses that occupational pension schemes, created as a result of decisions by the social partners, can play a very important role in ensuring that employees have additional pension provision. The EESC disagrees with the approach to IORPs purely as financial market institutions, which fails to acknowledge their important social function. A one-size-fits-all approach is not the right way of achieving the Commission's objectives given the numerous differences between pension schemes in Member States.
Download — EESC opinion: Review of Institutions for Occupational Retirement Pensions Directive
The European Commission adopted on 20 February 2014 the new guidelines on how Member States can support airports and airlines in line with EU state aid rules. The guidelines are aimed at ensuring good connections between regions and the mobility of European citizens, while minimising distortions of competition in the Single Market. They are part of the Commission's State Aid Modernisation (SAM) strategy, which aims at fostering growth in the Single Market by encouraging more effective aid measures and focusing the Commission’s scrutiny on cases with the biggest impact on competition.
Download — Review of the Community Guidelines on financing of airports and Start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports
