European Economic
and Social Committee
Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance/European Neighbourhood Instrument
The EESC welcomes the two proposals for regulations and issues a set of specific recommendations.
On IPA II:
- The EESC supports the greater flexibility introduced by the new instrument and approves the equal treatment among beneficiary countries, by eliminating the difference in the type of support available for candidate and potential candidate countries.
- The EESC has reservation as regards the proposal to use a sector-based approach for EU financial assistance. This approach should be used only when partner countries have clear rules and procedures in place.
- The EESC asks the European Commission to set-up appropriate platforms in order to involve civil society organisations in all stages of the assistance: preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.
- The EESC asks the European Commission to better target the needs of social partners when providing assistance to civil society in the region.
On ENI:
- The EESC welcomes the “more for more” approach that encourages the countries covered by the Instrument showing sustainable progress in the direction of democracy and respect for human rights and international law.
- The EESC recommends the setting-up of platforms for dialogue between civil society and the governments in the EU neighbouring countries, and stands ready to assist the European commission and the European External Action Service in achieving this objective
- The EESC recommends that EU Delegations carry out a comprehensive mapping of CSOs in the region, which could help all EU institutions building solid relations with an emerging civil society sector.
- The EESC recommends that the EU pay more attention to the capacity building of institutions in the partner countries in charge with the implementation of the assistance, in order to assure a good absorption capacity and transparency in the use of the funds
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
KLJUČNE TOČKE EGSO: prihvaća sadržaj prijedloga i smatra da njegov komentar nije potreban, te je odlučio o njemu dati pozitivno mišljenje.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
KLJUČNE TOČKE: EGSO: smatra da je plan REPowerEU Europske komisije korak u pravom smjeru prema neovisnosti EU-a o ruskoj opskrbi plinom i naftom; ističe da su se mnogi problemi koje sada treba…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Pojedinačna i kolektivna potrošnja vlastite energije kao čimbenik u borbi za zelenu i energetsku tranziciju te gospodarsku i socijalnu ravnotežu Ključne točke EGSO: smatra da bi lokalne i…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Pitanja pravednosti i učinkovitosti u pomorskom prijevozu Ključne točke EGSO: naglašava da se zelenom tranzicijom sektora pomorskog prijevoza moraju uzeti u obzir značajke specifične za pojedinu…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Prelazak na dugoročno održiv prometni sustav KLJUČNE TOČKE EGSO: smatra da će građani i poduzeća aktivno podupirati prelazak na dugoročno održiv prometni sustav samo ako njegova…