European Economic
and Social Committee
Setting the course for a sustainable blue planet, an update of the international ocean governance agenda
Key points
The EESC:
- Considers that Ocean Governance is a complex and transdisciplinary topic calling for international cooperation. Furthermore, it is not just a marine affair: the impact of humans on the oceans also comes from land-based activities (waste, pesticides, antibiotics, phosphates, plastics, unexploded ordnance). Therefore, Ocean Governance needs to take into account all SDGs, not just objective n. 14.
- Supports the target of 30% of marine protected areas, and asks to create the necessary implementation and monitoring mechanisms. The Committee supports the suspension of any deep-sea mining authorisation until more scientific evidence is gathered concerning the environmental impact of such activities: investments are needed for conclusive research.
- Notes that fisheries are currently impacting fish stocks and must be made more sustainable, thanks to a zero-tolerance approach towards illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IIU), more severe norms on bottom trawling, and more compliance with labour rules in this industry: 19 EU Member States, some of which are important coastal countries, have not yet ratified ILO convention n. 188 on Work in Fishing and should proceed to its ratification and transposal into national law.
- Points out that small-scale fishing is vital for the economy of coastal communities and should be supported. Also, aquaculture and algaculture should be recognised for their ability to provide nutrition to a big part of the world's population.
- Underlines that maritime transport covers over 90% of goods transported in this planet, and as such it can have a remarkable environmental impact: ship demolition, if not performed according to existing standards, can pollute the ocean and put marine life and workers' health at risk. Therefore, the use of flags of convenience in order to circumvent obligations in the field of ship demolition should be discouraged.
- Deems it crucial to invest in impact evaluation of marine activities on employment, remunerations and living conditions, technology, and workers' training. A better coordination between public administrations (at international, national and local level) is necessary to achieve an integrated management of the ocean.
- Stresses that there is a need for more ocean literacy and for a better definition of concepts like safe harbour, since human beings who are in dangerous waters need first of all to be rescued.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNCTE PRINCIPALE CESE: întrucât conținutul propunerii formulate este satisfăcător și nu face obiectul niciunei observații din partea sa, Comitetul a hotărât să emită aviz favorabil cu privire la…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNCTELE PRINCIPALE: CESE: consideră că planul REPowerEU al Comisiei Europene reprezintă un pas în direcția cea bună pentru ca UE să devină independentă de aprovizionarea cu gaze și petrol din…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Avizul pe tema „Autoconsumul individual și colectiv de energie ca factor pentru realizarea tranziției verzi și a celei energetice și al echilibrului economic și social” Punctele principale: CESE:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerente privind echitatea și eficiența în domeniul transportului maritime Punctele principale: CESE: subliniază că tranziția verde în sectorul transportului maritim trebuie să țină cont de…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Tranziția către un sistem de transport durabil pe termen lung PUNCTE PRINCIPALE: CESE: consideră că cetățenii și întreprinderile vor sprijini în mod activ tranziția către un…