European Economic
and Social Committee
European Regional Development Fund
Key points:
Although the EESC welcomes the Commission's proposals for thematic concentration as a means to reduce fragmentation of effort, it nevertheless recommends showing greater flexibility, largely to make the territorial approach easier to apply and, thus, to improve the effectiveness of the policy.
As a consequence of the crisis, scarcity of both public and private resources may result in difficulties to provide the necessary co-financing for interventions which are essential for making the desired changes happen. The EESC considers that a flexible responsible approach with regard to co-financing rates and conditionality clauses would improve the chances of obtaining a lasting impact of the interventions financed by the Funds.
The ERDF can have a considerable impact both on the achievement of convergence objectives and on Europe-wide objectives in the area of competitiveness. Given that the level of resources cannot be increased in any significant way, the EESC believes there is a further potential in defining clearer objectives and ensuring that the proposed investment priorities are more precisely linked with the objectives. As the territorial approach lends itself to define more precise objectives, the EESC's view is that more emphasis is to be placed on Europe-wide territory-based strategies, such as existing or future macro-regional strategies, as references for area-specific objectives.
The EESC has often affirmed that given the concentration of resources, there is a need to provide resources and distinct legal frameworks to bolster transnational cooperation and thus strengthen links within Europe. The EESC further proposes that the Commission consider widening the scope of possible interventions undertaken by the Connecting Europe Facility by opening it up so that it can co-finance projects of Special European Interest in addition to transport and communication ones. Finally, the EESC recommends introducing mechanisms that ensure that financed projects do serve the interest of better economic, social and territorial cohesion in Europe.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNCTE PRINCIPALE CESE: întrucât conținutul propunerii formulate este satisfăcător și nu face obiectul niciunei observații din partea sa, Comitetul a hotărât să emită aviz favorabil cu privire la…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNCTELE PRINCIPALE: CESE: consideră că planul REPowerEU al Comisiei Europene reprezintă un pas în direcția cea bună pentru ca UE să devină independentă de aprovizionarea cu gaze și petrol din…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Avizul pe tema „Autoconsumul individual și colectiv de energie ca factor pentru realizarea tranziției verzi și a celei energetice și al echilibrului economic și social” Punctele principale: CESE:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerente privind echitatea și eficiența în domeniul transportului maritime Punctele principale: CESE: subliniază că tranziția verde în sectorul transportului maritim trebuie să țină cont de…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Tranziția către un sistem de transport durabil pe termen lung PUNCTE PRINCIPALE: CESE: consideră că cetățenii și întreprinderile vor sprijini în mod activ tranziția către un…