European Economic
and Social Committee
European Regional Development Fund
Key points:
Although the EESC welcomes the Commission's proposals for thematic concentration as a means to reduce fragmentation of effort, it nevertheless recommends showing greater flexibility, largely to make the territorial approach easier to apply and, thus, to improve the effectiveness of the policy.
As a consequence of the crisis, scarcity of both public and private resources may result in difficulties to provide the necessary co-financing for interventions which are essential for making the desired changes happen. The EESC considers that a flexible responsible approach with regard to co-financing rates and conditionality clauses would improve the chances of obtaining a lasting impact of the interventions financed by the Funds.
The ERDF can have a considerable impact both on the achievement of convergence objectives and on Europe-wide objectives in the area of competitiveness. Given that the level of resources cannot be increased in any significant way, the EESC believes there is a further potential in defining clearer objectives and ensuring that the proposed investment priorities are more precisely linked with the objectives. As the territorial approach lends itself to define more precise objectives, the EESC's view is that more emphasis is to be placed on Europe-wide territory-based strategies, such as existing or future macro-regional strategies, as references for area-specific objectives.
The EESC has often affirmed that given the concentration of resources, there is a need to provide resources and distinct legal frameworks to bolster transnational cooperation and thus strengthen links within Europe. The EESC further proposes that the Commission consider widening the scope of possible interventions undertaken by the Connecting Europe Facility by opening it up so that it can co-finance projects of Special European Interest in addition to transport and communication ones. Finally, the EESC recommends introducing mechanisms that ensure that financed projects do serve the interest of better economic, social and territorial cohesion in Europe.
Recommended for you
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:believes that both the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund (CF) should also focus on increasing access to reskilling and upskilling as well as on developing economic growth opportunities…
Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:stresses that the need to reduce regional and territorial disparities remains one of the key priorities of EU integration and that the use of traditional, proven and effective…
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
News
The European Economic and Social Committee's ECO section has adopted its evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund for the 2014-2020 period. They aim to assess…
European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development / Ukraine
Opinion
Key points The Russian invasion of Ukraine is hitting the EU's agricultural and agri-food sectors hard. The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) therefore endorses the new additional aid…
Establishing the European Social Fund as part of the National and Regional Partnership Plan
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:calls for raising social spending in National and Regional Partnership Plans from 14% to 20% and earmarking at least 14% for the European Social Fund (ESF) to reinforce the EU’s…