European Economic
and Social Committee
The future of cohesion policy (Exploratory opinion at the request of the Romanian Presidency)
Key points:
The EESC
- considers cohesion policy to be the fundamental pillars for bringing the EU closer to its citizens and for reducing disparities among EU regions and inequalities among people;
- is of the firm view that the proposal to reduce the size of the cohesion policy budget for the period 2021-2027 is unacceptable;
- believes that there is a need for a new ambitious and clear European strategy that is aligned with the UN 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals;
- Considers it is important that whilst embarking on a much needed effort to make cohesion policy future proof. The EESC believes that EU should not forget the challenges of today, which continue to impact society greatly. Here the EESC is specifically referring to social challenges (marginalisation and discrimination of minorities and specific ethnic groups, or domestic violence)and economic challenges (access to finance and upskilling);
- is of the opinion that all regions must be eligible for funding;
- believes that if Europe is to move to the next level of economic development cohesion policy must increasingly adopt a regionally differentiated approach when it comes to investments and policy responses;
- welcomes the stronger link with the European Semester and also calls for integration with the country-specific recommendations as a means of encouraging structural reforms.
- expects a stronger link between the European level investment strategy and that of Member States. It is important that the funds do not substitute for the efforts of the Member States but complement them;
- believes that the regulatory package should be much simpler and avoid micromanaging the funds;
- is calling on Commission to promote the possibility of a simplified procedure to access funds for projects of a small size.
- supports the use of financial instruments but calls on the Commission to ensure that when devising such instruments, a thorough test of suitability is carried out to ensure that such instruments are suitable for all Member States;
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNCTE PRINCIPALE CESE: întrucât conținutul propunerii formulate este satisfăcător și nu face obiectul niciunei observații din partea sa, Comitetul a hotărât să emită aviz favorabil cu privire la…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNCTELE PRINCIPALE: CESE: consideră că planul REPowerEU al Comisiei Europene reprezintă un pas în direcția cea bună pentru ca UE să devină independentă de aprovizionarea cu gaze și petrol din…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Avizul pe tema „Autoconsumul individual și colectiv de energie ca factor pentru realizarea tranziției verzi și a celei energetice și al echilibrului economic și social” Punctele principale: CESE:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerente privind echitatea și eficiența în domeniul transportului maritime Punctele principale: CESE: subliniază că tranziția verde în sectorul transportului maritim trebuie să țină cont de…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Tranziția către un sistem de transport durabil pe termen lung PUNCTE PRINCIPALE: CESE: consideră că cetățenii și întreprinderile vor sprijini în mod activ tranziția către un…