European Economic
and Social Committee
LIFE+/Mid-term review
Key points
- Because the first LIFE+ projects only began in January 2009 as a result of implementation difficulties, the mid-term review of the LIFE+ Programme (period: 2007 to 2013) being considered provides insufficient information to make a qualified assessment for the current programming period.
- Nevertheless, the EESC has always stressed the high importance of the LIFE Programme, which has been running for nearly 20 years, for developing and shaping European environmental policy. It believes that it is also necessary and appropriate to continue and further develop the programme during the next funding period (2013–2020).
- The LIFE Programme must be as flexible an instrument as possible to enable the Commission to play an effective shaping role. LIFE accounts for around 0.2% of the EU budget and can provide valuable contributions and suggestions for possible solutions. However it can neither correct failures arising from other EU policy areas nor finance all EU environment-related strategies.
- The requirements stemming from problems in implementing EU environment policy should be the deciding factor in future choices for LIFE projects. Concern for balanced allocation of funding between Member States should not play any role in this respect in future.
- Environmental policy is more developed in Europe than in other parts of the world because of the demands of an actively involved civil society. In this respect, the Commission rightly emphasises the role of nature and environmental protection organisations which is also acknowledged by the EESC. But other sectors of civil society should also be encouraged to cooperate more closely in LIFE projects in the future. The LIFE+ funding mechanisms should be organised in such a way that good projects do not founder because of rigid co-financing conditions.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNCTE PRINCIPALE CESE: întrucât conținutul propunerii formulate este satisfăcător și nu face obiectul niciunei observații din partea sa, Comitetul a hotărât să emită aviz favorabil cu privire la…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNCTELE PRINCIPALE: CESE: consideră că planul REPowerEU al Comisiei Europene reprezintă un pas în direcția cea bună pentru ca UE să devină independentă de aprovizionarea cu gaze și petrol din…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Avizul pe tema „Autoconsumul individual și colectiv de energie ca factor pentru realizarea tranziției verzi și a celei energetice și al echilibrului economic și social” Punctele principale: CESE:…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerente privind echitatea și eficiența în domeniul transportului maritime Punctele principale: CESE: subliniază că tranziția verde în sectorul transportului maritim trebuie să țină cont de…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Tranziția către un sistem de transport durabil pe termen lung PUNCTE PRINCIPALE: CESE: consideră că cetățenii și întreprinderile vor sprijini în mod activ tranziția către un…