European Economic
and Social Committee
Third country state-owned enterprises in EU public procurement markets
Gist of the opinion
The EESC believes that opening-up of the public procurement systems of all countries to international trade under the Agreement on Government Procurement (WTO GPA) is beneficial.
The EESC believes that the EU must increase negotiating power to improve access to third countries' public markets, in line with its primary and secondary legislation, given that the EU has opened up over 80% of its public markets while the other major developed economies have only opened up 20% of theirs.
The EESC strongly urges the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission to ensure more effective, strategic defence of the EU's interests in the area of access to public markets both internally and internationally.
The EESC believes that there should be a level playing field for contracting enterprises, based on reciprocity with third country enterprises that respect the key principles of international public procurement.
The EESC recommends that EU internal market legislators and EU international negotiators in the area of international public procurement, be consistent and aware of the potential reciprocal effects of their activities.
The EESC feels it is essential to set in motion systematic monitoring of the consistency between the results of bilateral and multilateral negotiations carried out by the Commission with authorisation from the Member States and the ensuing full, genuine implementation by the Member States of the measures adopted.
The EESC calls for swift adoption of the announced Market Access Scheme for Procurement – MASP, with clear, transparent, tried and tested mechanisms for reciprocal opening-up of markets to ensure symmetrical access to public markets, adapting the 2004 public procurement package accordingly.
The EESC calls for the approach based on prevention and an "early warning" system for projects and/or new third country regulations which are restrictive in the area of procurement to be beefed up, with a view to identifying potential barriers and condemning them internationally right from the start.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
FŐBB PONTOK Az EGSZB: megfelelőnek tartja a javaslat tartalmát, és részéről további megjegyzést nem kíván hozzáfűzni, ezért úgy határozott, hogy a javaslattal kapcsolatban támogató véleményt…
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
FŐBB PONTOK Az EGSZB: úgy véli, hogy az Európai Bizottság REPowerEU terve a helyes irányba tett lépés ahhoz, hogy az EU függetlenné váljon az orosz gáz- és kőolajellátástól, rámutat arra, hogy a…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Az egyéni és kollektív energiafogyasztás mint a zöld és energetikai átállásért, valamint a gazdasági és társadalmi egyensúlyért folytatott küzdelem egyik tényezője Főbb pontok Az EGSZB: úgy véli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Méltányossági és hatékonysági megfontolások a tengeri szállításban Főbb pontok Az EGSZB: hangsúlyozza, hogy Európa versenyelőnyeinek megőrzése, valamint az átállás okozta különbségek, az…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
A hosszú távon fenntartható közlekedési rendszerre való átállás FŐBB PONTOK Az EGSZB: úgy véli, hogy a polgárok és a vállalkozások csak akkor fogják aktívan támogatni a hosszú…