European Economic
and Social Committee
The Biodiversity policy of the EU (own-initiative opinion)
Key points:
- The EESC draws particular attention to the Commission's comments on the importance of protecting biodiversity, which it compares to climate protection. This is not just about conserving animal and plant species: it concerns the very conditions of human existence.
- The EESC calls for immediate implementation of the Birds and Habitats Directives. The same goes for the Water Framework Directive, whose consistent and immediate implementation would in the EESC's view make a considerable contribution to improving biodiversity protection.
- The Member States must finally determine actual financial needs arising from the implementation of EU law, and the Commission must make the necessary funding available. The financing of biodiversity through the second CAP pillar can be considered to have failed, and the EESC therefore calls for a separate budget heading to be introduced under which financing for the Natura 2000 network must be made available.
- The strengthening of Green Infrastructure is explicitly welcomed.
- The inconsistencies in EU policies have been criticised by Commission departments, the Environment Council, the European Parliament, the CoR and the EESC, and there has been no substantial change in this respect in recent years..
- In hindsight, the EU's various biodiversity strategies and biodiversity programmes from 1998, 2001, 2006 and 2010, each of which accurately described the problems and set out appropriate tools, must therefore be regarded as largely futile.
- The EESC therefore observes once again – as in a large number of its previous opinions on EU biodiversity – that it is political will that is lacking, not legal foundations. No change in the current legal basis is needed.
Relevant EESC opinions
- NAT/520: CAP towards 2020
- NAT/491: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020
- NAT/471: Biodiversity beyond 2010
- NAT/449: CAP reform 2013
- NAT/424: Deforestation and forest degradation / climate change and biodiversity
- NAT/334: Halting the loss of biodiversity
- NAT/296 Conservation of biodiversity
Related documents
European Commission
- Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council the mid-term review of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 - COM(2015) 478 final
- Biodiversity Strategy
- Summary of progress towards the 2020 biodiversity targets
- Citizens' summary - EU biodiversity strategy up to 2020 (available in all EU languages)
European Parliament
Council
Committee of the Regions
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
KERNAUSSAGEN: Der EWSA stimmt dem Inhalt des Vorschlags zu und hat keine Bemerkungen dazu vorzubringen und beschloss, eine befürwortende Stellungnahme zu diesem Vorschlag abzugeben.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
KERNAUSSAGEN: Der EWSA: ist der Auffassung, dass der REPowerEU-Plan der Europäischen Kommission ein Schritt in die richtige Richtung ist, um die EU unabhängig Gas und Öl aus Russland zu machen;…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Individueller und kollektiver Eigenenergieverbrauch als Faktor für die Öko- und Energiewende und das wirtschaftliche und soziale Gleichgewicht Kernaussagen Der EWSA ist der Auffassung, dass die…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Gerechtigkeits- und Effizienzerwägungen im Seeverkehr Kernaussagen Der EWSA betont, dass beim Übergang zu einem grünen Schifffahrtssektor länder-, branchen- und berufsspezifische Merkmale…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
Umstellung auf ein zukunftsfähiges Verkehrssystem KERNAUSSAGEN Der EWSA ist der Auffassung, dass Bürger und Unternehmen die Umstellung auf ein zukunftsfähiges Verkehrssystem nur…