European Economic
and Social Committee
Own resources – 2025 proposal
Key points
The EESC:
- underlines that the debate on new own resources should evolve beyond technical adjustments and become a strategic reflection on how to strengthen the EU’s financial autonomy, cohesion and competitiveness;
- encourages the European Commission to further refine the overall design of the proposed own-resources package to make it ambitious, balanced and future-oriented. The Commission should:
(a) set out a clear roadmap towards gradually reducing reliance on GNI-based contributions;
(b) design measures and promote cohesion and fairness, ensuring that all Member States contribute in proportion to their economic strength;
(c) integrate a competitiveness and SME impact lens in all new own-resources proposals;
(d) maintain a degree of flexibility in crisis-response mechanisms; - invites the Council and the European Parliament to build a broad and lasting consensus through a pragmatic, phased and evidence-based approach. The institutions should: (a) advance the proposals that are ready for implementation first – such as the CBAM -based resource, the modernised plastics contribution and the reform of customs retention – while allowing more time for discussion and analysis of complex instruments; (b) agree on a joint interinstitutional review clause so that all new own resources are assessed within two years from the entry into force; (c) ensure that mechanisms to prevent regressivity and compensate Member States on the EU’s external borders are integrated into the final package;
- finds that the Corporate Resource for Europe (CORE) proposal lacks clarity on its practical functioning expresses some reservations about the CORE proposal as a whole
- welcomes the positive contribution that both CBAM and the e-waste mechanism could bring to sustainability and circularity;
- notes that the tobacco excise duty own resource proposal should be designed carefully to avoid negative effects in border regions or incentives for illicit trade;
- supports the reduction of customs-duty retention to 10% as a step towards greater EU financial coherence, provided that appropriate compensatory mechanisms are established;
- welcomes the removal of the EUR 150 de-minimis threshold for parcels sent to the EU from third countries and the introduction of an e-commerce handling fee as of November 2026, with this handling possibly becoming a new own resource of the EU budget.
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings ECO/684
-
Follow-up from the Commission ECO/684
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…