European Economic
and Social Committee
The Union's budget and the rule of law
The EESC welcomes the proposal for economic corrective measures regarding Member States that commit serious violations of the rule of law in Europe, and recommends that the interdependence between democracy, fundamental rights and the rule of law is better reflected. The Commission should develop further channels for debate on Article 2 TEU values, and should include the EESC in this work. The EESC reiterates its call for the creation of a system of regular and independent monitoring of the implementation of these values in the Member States.
Key points
- The EESC welcomes the Commission proposal for a regulation creating a new tool that would allow for economic corrective measures with regard to Member States that commit serious and persistent violations of the values listed in Article 2 TEU. The EESC also welcomes the fact that implementing acts proposed by the Commission under this regulation would be adopted by reverse qualified majority voting in the Council.
- The EESC recommends that the proposal be amended to include a broader notion of the rule of law that encompasses the protection of fundamental rights and guarantees protecting pluralist democracy. The rule of law exists in an interdependent, inseparable, triangular relationship with fundamental rights and democracy. Only by guaranteeing these three values in conjunction with each other is it possible to prevent the abuse of state power.
- The EESC insists that the mechanism proposed by the Commission should be activated automatically where a generalised deficiency as regards the rule of law risks affecting the EU's financial interests.
- Furthermore, the EESC recommends that the proposal be amended to allow the Commission to propose an implementing act of the regulation in cases where there is a serious, persistent and systemic threat to the rule of law, fundamental rights or standards guaranteeing pluralist democracy.
- The EESC encourages the Commission, as a preventive measure, to further develop channels for political debate on Article 2 values in the Member States. The EESC also urges the Commission to propose the creation of a system of regular and independent monitoring of the implementation of these values in the Member States, along the lines previously suggested by the EESC and the European Parliament.
- The EESC recommends that it be included among the bodies that the Commission will keep informed of measures proposed or adopted under this legislation, and that it be specifically named among the relevant sources of information for the purposes of the Commission's determination as to the existence of a serious deficiency as regards the rule of law.
Downloads
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…