European Economic
and Social Committee
Regulation on European Chemicals Agency
Key points
The EESC:
- welcomes the proposed European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) regulation which will create an independent legal framework to help ECHA manage its growing duties efficiently with a view to protecting human health and the environment.
- believes that scientific assessments of chemicals should consider the needs of vulnerable groups in the decision-making process as some substances may pose particular risk for them. The EESC urges to integrate the One Health perspective into its chemical assessments to both address risks that disproportionately affect vulnerable groups and strengthen inclusive, transparent and coordinated governance;
- notes that the key to the future success of the Agency lies in ensuring that it is independent and seen to be so in the exercise of its duties and responsibilities. The issue of conflicts of interest must also be a central consideration to ensure widespread acceptance of scientific opinions;
- recommends that the new proposals ensure the widest possible access to all documents containing chemical data and all other sources of information on chemical data;
- considers that the Board of Appeal, consisting of a chairperson and two members, is far too narrow and restricted to deal adequately with the appeals. The EESC considers that the Board of Appeal must have a broader membership to ensure fairness and transparency;
- underlines that the precautionary principle must apply to protect public health and the environment in the event of failure to remedy diverging scientific opinions;
- calls for adequate resources to be provided for the ECHA committees and for timeliness indicators and service standards to be introduced;
- recommends establishing a permanent Civil Society Advisory Panel (CSAP) to the ECHA Management Board, with its opinions and minutes published;
- calls for the proactive publication of non-confidential inputs and plain-language summaries of opinions, decisions and reports, along with FAIR metadata and an API for data re-use. The EESC is also in favour of giving eligible non-profit organisations the right to address the Board of Appeal, and of granting fee waivers or reductions for such organisations.
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings NAT/965
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…