European Economic
and Social Committee
How to recalibrate the Green Deal that it fits for purpose
Key points
The EESC:
- while supporting fully the Green Deal and its objectives, points out the need to assess it in order to respond to exogenic shocks, the geopolitical situation, technological, social and economic evolution as well as progress achieved thus far;
- calls on the European Commission to set up the mapping of adopted measures within the Green Deal to avoid overlaps, conflicts and a cumulative burden and to publicly display an online dashboard recording the progress of each Member State;
- points out that the Committee itself should be empowered and endowed with the necessary resources to play the role of an independent monitor of the Green Deal implementation, being able to create a fact-based picture of the progress achieved within the different pillars of the Green Deal;
- provides in the opinion a set of corrective measures aiming at removing overlaps, conflicting provisions and excessive unnecessary administrative burdens;
- stresses that a just transition should be at the core of the next EU political agenda, by developing a solid framework capable of fostering a carbon-neutral economy, without further jeopardising the socioeconomic opportunities of vulnerable people and regions;
- asks for a more ambitious and systematic approach to financing the investments under the Green Deal, in order to ensure the robust involvement of private financial sources;
- proposes making use of all the provisional sources in hard to decarbonise sectors, on the basis of thorough long-term cost-benefit analysis, not strictly requiring only net zero sources and technologies;
- asks the Commission to display publicly online the different financing programmes within the Green Deal at one place in a comprehensive and user-friendly manner, allowing the link between national portals and existing European portals and the development of synergies between different funding sources.
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
-
INT/1065 CR
-
Follow-up from the Commission INT/1065
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…