European Economic
and Social Committee
Ex-post Evaluation of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund for the 2014-2020 programming period
Key points
The EESC:
recognises that the AMIF has been essential in responding to the needs of Member States in the areas of asylum, migration and integration. However, administrative burdens risk undermining the effectiveness of projects as staff are forced to spend more time on paperwork than on implementing activities on the ground;
recommends that the design and implementation of AMIF should be further improved to take into consideration the specific challenges and needs of all EU countries (depending on whether they are first arrival, transit or destination countries) and their structures and capacities;
recommends that input from the EESC, social partners, civil society organisations and other stakeholders involved in projects should also be gathered during the ex-ante and mid-term evaluation stages and incorporated into the design and implementation of the future programme to make it more effective;
stresses that more flexibility in the implementation of activities is necessary to address local and individual priorities and needs in a timely manner, especially for those with specific vulnerabilities;
notes that project initiators must be able to receive confirmation of funding with reasonable notice, and funds must be sufficient to cover the entire duration of the projects and they must arrive on time;
stresses that bureaucracy and administrative requirements must be lightened and simplified, and the administrative burden must be reduced;
points out that the fund has created excellent opportunities for building stronger links and networks between stakeholders. Communication and cooperation between project promoters and the responsible public authorities should be improved;
stresses that monitoring/supervisory committees for the AMIF Fund should be set up in all Member States, and civil society organisations and social partners involved in this area must be full members of these committees.
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings REX/595
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…