European Economic
and Social Committee
Ex-post Evaluation of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund for the 2014-2020 programming period
Key points
The EESC:
recognises that the AMIF has been essential in responding to the needs of Member States in the areas of asylum, migration and integration. However, administrative burdens risk undermining the effectiveness of projects as staff are forced to spend more time on paperwork than on implementing activities on the ground;
recommends that the design and implementation of AMIF should be further improved to take into consideration the specific challenges and needs of all EU countries (depending on whether they are first arrival, transit or destination countries) and their structures and capacities;
recommends that input from the EESC, social partners, civil society organisations and other stakeholders involved in projects should also be gathered during the ex-ante and mid-term evaluation stages and incorporated into the design and implementation of the future programme to make it more effective;
stresses that more flexibility in the implementation of activities is necessary to address local and individual priorities and needs in a timely manner, especially for those with specific vulnerabilities;
notes that project initiators must be able to receive confirmation of funding with reasonable notice, and funds must be sufficient to cover the entire duration of the projects and they must arrive on time;
stresses that bureaucracy and administrative requirements must be lightened and simplified, and the administrative burden must be reduced;
points out that the fund has created excellent opportunities for building stronger links and networks between stakeholders. Communication and cooperation between project promoters and the responsible public authorities should be improved;
stresses that monitoring/supervisory committees for the AMIF Fund should be set up in all Member States, and civil society organisations and social partners involved in this area must be full members of these committees.
Downloads
-
Record of proceedings REX/595
Recommended for you
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:believes that both the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund (CF) should also focus on increasing access to reskilling and upskilling as well as on developing economic growth opportunities…
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
News
The European Economic and Social Committee's ECO section has adopted its evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund for the 2014-2020 period. They aim to assess…
Evaluation of European Social Fund 2014-2020
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:agrees that the European Social Fund (ESF) in the period 2014-2020 made a significant contribution to promoting employability, education and training, and to fighting social…
Ex-post evaluation of Horizon 2020
Opinion
Key points The EESC: Regarding effectiveness: Considers the impact of Horizon 2020 (H2020) to be positive. The programme is considered to be much better than its predecessors, delivering a…
Evaluating EU cohesion funds: lessons from 2014-2020
News
The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) has adopted in plenary its evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund for the 2014-2020 period. The opinion…