European Economic
and Social Committee
Patent package
Key points
The EESC:
- welcomes the European Commission's plans to take action on supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), and specifically the plan to create a novel centralised SPC for European patents with unitary effect (unitary patents, UPs). These are key for establishing a more harmonised patent system within the EU;
- believes that the proposal for a centralised Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) system has the potential to effectively promote transparency and predictability in SEPs. However, creating appropriate processes and administration for establishing the essentiality and the FRAND terms and conditions for a given SEP will be a major challenge for this project due to its technical and legal complexity. The EESC therefore requests that the Commission further investigate the project, and consider further involving experts and competent authorities, including the Unified Patent Court (UPC);
- is of the opinion that it is relevant and paramount that the patent system provides a system for Compulsory Licensing (CL) which is transparent and fair to all stakeholders (the rights holders, the potential licensees and the public), and safeguards fundamental rights. The present proposal does not fulfil these criteria: it neither complies with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), nor with the minimum standards required by the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs-Agreement)[1];
- recommends that establishing CLCMs for European and unity patents be dealt with by a court that is also technically competent, such as the UPC, on the basis of a transparent legal and procedural framework.
[1] Processes must guarantee a fair trial, including the right to an effective remedy (Articles 6 and 13 ECHR; Articles 42 and 59 TRIPs).
For more information please contact the INT Section Secretariat.
Downloads
-
EESC Opinion on EU Patent package
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…