You are here

Opinions

Displaying 41 - 50 of 2072

Pages

Adopted on 18/10/2018
Reference: 
NAT/750-EESC-2018-03220
Plenary session: 
538 -
Oct 17, 2018 Oct 18, 2018

The proposal is intended to introduce some targeted changes to Council Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), under which the European Union supports, coordinates and supplements the action of Member States in the field of civil protection to prevent, prepare for and respond to natural and man-made disasters within and outside the Union. The proposal acknowledges that disaster prevention efforts are crucial to limit the need for crisis and emergency support.

EESC opinion: Strengthen EU's civil protection response - rescEU

Ongoing (updated on 21/01/2019)
Reference: 
SOC/583-EESC-2018
Plenary session: 
543 -
May 15, 2019 May 16, 2019

Against a background of rising poverty levels during the crisis, levels that remain high in many Member States, in particular among the unemployed, this own-initiative opinion would address the huge differences in levels of protection under national unemployment insurance systems within the EU.
Possible standards in this respect could be:

  • a minimum standard for the net replacement rate of unemployment benefits;
  • a minimum standard of coverage ratio of unemployed people receiving unemployment payments;
  • a minimum standard for the duration of unemployment benefit entitlement;
  • a right to (re)qualification and training

With the objective of promoting upward social convergence within the EU, the proposal for such standards is a concrete step towards effective implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights recently announced by the EU institutions in Gothenburg.

Information memo: Common minimum standards in the field of unemployment insurance in EU Member States – a concrete step towards the effective implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights (own-initiative opinion)

Adopted on 19/09/2018
Reference: 
NAT/737-EESC-2018
Plenary session: 
537 -
Sep 19, 2018 Sep 20, 2018

The annual revision of the Eurostat SDG Report must be an opportunity for broader dialogue with civil society concerning which indicators be included and what the target for each of these should be. This own-initiative opinion examines how organised civil society could be better involved in a more qualitative follow-up of the annual revision of the Eurostat SDG report as part of SDG monitoring and follow-up programmes that have been established.

EESC opinion: Indicators better suited to evaluate the SDGs – the civil society contribution (own-initiative opinion)

Adopted on 08/02/2018
Reference: 
NAT/718-EESC-2017
Plenary session: 
532 - Feb 15, 2018

The recommendations of this opinion would be principally addressed to the political decision-makers at different levels in order to practically align the policies to the needs of non-state climate actors.

EESC opinion: Boosting climate actions by non-state actors

Pages