European Economic
and Social Committee
Revision of the Common Fisheries Policy
Key points
The EESC:
calls for the mandatory and guaranteed allocation of EUR 6.1 billion for the implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), in line with the current 2021-2027 budget, to preserve one of the EU’s few exclusive competences and avoid competition with other sectors. A dedicated chapter should address fisheries ensuring adequate public investment and legal certainty for operators;
is concerned about the apparent prioritisation of achieving the objectives of the non-binding European Ocean Pact, instead of prioritising contributing to the achievement of the objectives of the CFP, which is the objective defined under the TFEU and the CFP Regulation;
welcomes the proposal to strengthen coherence and synergies with related initiatives and funds to avoid duplication of efforts and maximise the impact of public investments. However, it urges the EC to ensure that governments make the necessary investments to meet the objectives of the CFP;
stresses the need to make the definition of small-scale coastal fishing more flexible, basing it on the criteria established by the FAO and the regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs);
points out that it is imperative that Member States (MS) develop plans and measures to modernise and renew their vessels, to improve energy efficiency, on-board safety and working conditions, without increasing fishing capacity;
welcomes the European Commission’s (EC) intention to establish a simple architecture without predefining measures and detailed eligibility rules at Union level in an overly prescriptive manner. The Committee urges the MS to maintain this spirit of flexibility and simplification when developing their national and regional partnership plans (NRCPs). It also calls for the establishment of guidelines on the ‘do no significant harm’ principle applicable across all sectors;
agrees with the need to maintain a certain degree of flexibility in the determination of aid intensity rates, in order to allow MS to adapt their NRCPs to the specific characteristics of their sectors and regions;
welcomes the new simplification and wording relating to operations eligible for State aid.
Downloads
-
Record of Proceedings NAT/967
-
Follow-up from the Commission NAT/967
Recommended for you
Revision of the Common market Organisation (CMO) Regulation
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:welcomes the proposed modifications by the European Commission (EC) in the proposal COM(2025) 553 final for the revision of the Common Market Organisation (CMO);points out that…
EESC PLENARY: Interview with rapporteur Javier Garat on the common fisheries policy
Article
<< Back to BulletinWe spoke with the rapporteur for the EESC opinion NAT/967 on the 'Revision of the common fisheries policy'.What are the main findings of the opinion?The opinion…
Revision of the Union’s plant health policy
Opinion
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post-2027
Opinion
The EU Youth Test at the EESC is being applied to this opinion. Rural Youth Europe was chosen by a group of interested youth organisations to represent all of them during the opinion-making process…
Evaluation of Common Agricultural Policy delivery on its objectives
Opinion
Key pointsBased on the data collected during the evaluation process through both meetings with national stakeholders and a targeted online questionnaire, the EESC recommends:that direct payments and…