European Economic
and Social Committee
EESC opinion: European Social Fund
Key points
The EESC is in favour of the ESF continuing to contribute to securing social, economic and territorial cohesion and to combating all forms of discrimination.
The ESF should be the preferred instrument for implementing the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy, particularly with regard to employment, education, social inclusion and combating poverty, in all regions of the EU. In every Member State, at least 40% of all ESF resources should be earmarked for the thematic objective "promoting employment and supporting labour mobility".
The EESC endorses the emphasis on social innovation, research and innovation, accessibility and use of information and communication technologies, enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs, environmental protection, the transition to a low-carbon economy and sustainable use of resources.
The EESC endorses the proposal that at least 20% of all ESF resources be earmarked for "promoting social inclusion and combating poverty".
The partnership principle, which involves the social and economic partners and organisations representing civil society, provides an essential guarantee that measures linked to the Structural Funds, particularly the European Social Fund, will work properly.
The EESC completely rejects the Commission's proposal to apply Structural Fund financial penalties and incentives on the basis of compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact.
Europe needs a different type of economic governance which focuses on growth and competitiveness, facilitates investment in human resources and promotes justice, cohesion and the principles of solidarity and social integration. The EU's budget has to be reformed in line with these principles.
The budget allocated to the European Social Fund must at least be maintained at the same level as for the last planning period. The ESF must also support involvement of citizens, civil society and a greater awareness of the common values of Europe.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…