European Economic
and Social Committee
EESC opinion: Social impacts of the new Economic Governance legislation
Key points
- Europe needs to speak with one voice if it is to find a convincing response to the most serious financial and economic crisis, and crisis of confidence, since the EU was established.
- The new structure for European economic governance (EEG) must safeguard the democratic rights of the Member States and their freely elected parliaments, as well as the autonomy of the social partners.
- The EESC recommends a smart, sustainable budgetary consolidation that safeguards vital social investment.
- The austerity measures will have a negative impact on vulnerable groups and on key social infrastructure such as childcare or education. This will seriously impair the quality of life of vulnerable groups.
- The EESC finds that the implementation of the European Semester and the "six-pack" must not undermine the poverty reduction target set out in the Europe 2020 strategy and that all measures must be assessed to determine whether they will increase poverty.
- The EESC stresses that, as a matter of urgency, it is crucial to assess the social impact of the new economic governance rules, and calls in particular for:
- a "social investment pact" to be developed;
- the social partners, social organisations and non-governmental organisations to be fully involved at an early stage in all actions;
- a convention to be set up to work out a strategy for securing social progress in upcoming treaty amendments;
- a "social safety net" to be provided by means of equivalent "social governance";
- the freedom of the social partners to undertake collective bargaining to be safeguarded and promoted;
- new sources of revenue to be opened up to consolidate public finances; and
- public spending to be made more efficient and better targeted, and action against tax evasion to be stepped up.
Recommended for you
Decision repealing Directive 89/629/EEC
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: avendo concluso che il contenuto della proposta è soddisfacente e non richiede alcun commento da parte sua, ha deciso di esprimere parere favorevole al testo proposto.
RePowerEU Plan
Opinion
PUNTI PRINCIPALI: Il CESE: ritiene che il piano REPowerEU della Commissione europea sia un passo nella giusta direzione per rendere l'UE indipendente dalle forniture di gas e petrolio dalla…
Individual and collective energy self-consumption as a factor in the fight for the green and energy transition, and for economic and social balance
Opinion
Autoconsumo energetico individuale e collettivo come fattore nella lotta per la transizione verde ed energetica e per l'equilibrio economico e sociale Punti principali Il CESE: ritiene che gli…
Equity and efficiency considerations for maritime transportation
Opinion
Considerazioni di equità e di efficienza per il trasporto marittimo Punti principali Il CESE: sottolinea che la transizione verde del trasporto marittimo deve tenere conto delle caratteristiche…
The transition to a long-term sustainable transport system
Opinion
La transizione verso un sistema di trasporto sostenibile a lungo termine PUNTI PRINCIPALI Il CESE: ritiene che i cittadini e le imprese sosterranno attivamente la transizione…