The EESC issues between 160 and 190 opinions and information reports a year.
It also organises several annual initiatives and events with a focus on civil society and citizens’ participation such as the Civil Society Prize, the Civil Society Days, the Your Europe, Your Say youth plenary and the ECI Day.
Here you can find news and information about the EESC'swork, including its social media accounts, the EESC Info newsletter, photo galleries and videos.
The EESC brings together representatives from all areas of organised civil society, who give their independent advice on EU policies and legislation. The EESC's326 Members are organised into three groups: Employers, Workers and Various Interests.
The EESC has six sections, specialising in concrete topics of relevance to the citizens of the European Union, ranging from social to economic affairs, energy, environment, external relations or the internal market.
The EESC considers the Social Imbalance Procedure (SIP) an opportunity to enhance the coordination of national efforts to improve their social governance and reduce social inequalities within a country and between Member States
underlines that the SIP should be integrated into the European Semester, throughout its different phases
calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider making existing rules for funds allocation (including the ESIF, RRF and others) more flexible.
The opinion stresses that wood is a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to traditional building materials, emitting fewer carbon emissions and promoting forest conservation through sustainable management.
Education and training in timber construction can create job opportunities in rural areas.
Wood is an ideal material for earthquake-prone areas due to its anti-seismic properties.
1) Citizens and businesses will only actively support the transition to a long-term sustainable transport system if it is implemented in a way that is financially acceptable and socially feasible. Otherwise, there is a serious risk of failure and social unrest.
is pleased with the Commission's commitment to allot financial and human resources from EU funds to address wildlife trafficking;
highlights the significance of implementing effective and discouraging measures against wildlife trafficking, suggesting that the current level of sanctions proposed by the Council under the Environmental Crime Directive is insufficient and must be increased;
recommends the establishment of consistent structures in all Member States;
In the opinion, the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC)
welcomes the communication from the European Commission regarding the fertiliser crisis and its impact on European farmers (higher costs), consumers (food price inflation) and industry workers;
calls for both short-term and longer-term measures to limit the EU's dependence on imported mineral fertilisers, reduce the environmental impact of crop fertilisation and improve the functioning of the EU fertiliser market;
welcomes the establishment of a new fertiliser market observatory in 2023 to ensure transparency in the EU fertiliser market;
considers that the voluntary certification framework for carbon removals has the potential to incentivise removal efforts by providing clarity and reliability in measuring and verifying climate benefits;
considers that questions regarding the integration of carbon removals in EU policies, their impact on emissions reduction and the risk of greenwashing need to be addressed;
emphasises the importance of keeping the costs of measuring, reporting and verifying carbon removal activities low;
The EESC proposes the following changes to the new proposals:
lowering filing fees for SMEs and individual designers, perhaps charging them in proportion to their turnover;
a more radical simplification of the design filing systems available, using the expertise of patent agents to come up with solutions.
The EESC objects to the use of delegated acts to adopt rules on design disputes and appeals. These are matters which relate to the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
The EESC recommends striking a balance between the premature liquidation of companies, which can be very harmful, and starting proceedings too late, which will be useless;
providing a harmonised definition of grounds for insolvency and the ranking of creditor claims, otherwise the proposal may not help reach its goal of closing gaps in the Capital Markets Union;
revising Article 27, which would curtails entrepreneurial freedom by obliging counterparties to sign executory contracts, which would then assigned to the acquirer of the business without their consent.
warns against letting the move towards digital services do away with in-person services, which must remain available, in particular for vulnerable groups;
urges against cutting back on staffing levels in public services, as is often the case with digitalisation. Keeping sufficient staffing levels is a prerequisite for a successful transformation;
recommends making access to data subject to different levels of authorisation in order to safeguard data confidentiality and ensure that only data that is strictly necessary is disclosed.
The EESC recommends involving the EESC from the very beginning of the foresight process in future. Organised civil society can strengthen the EU's analysis and foresight capacities;
a strategic foresight agenda geared towards a new development model that combines economic, environmental and social sustainability and puts people at the centre;
setting out a clearer picture of the risks and scenarios should the desired objectives not be met, especially when it comes to the availability of raw materials, rare earth metals and water resources;
looking into the following strategic policy areas in the 2023 annual foresight exercise.