European Economic
and Social Committee
European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development / Ukraine
Key points
- The Russian invasion of Ukraine is hitting the EU's agricultural and agri-food sectors hard. The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) therefore endorses the new additional aid measure proposed by the European Commission. The Committee feels that this measure is absolutely necessary and calls on the European institutions to lose no time in adopting it.
- The war in Ukraine is demonstrating the geostrategic nature of the agri-food sector and the need to maintain food security in the European Union. Consequently, measures supporting the cash-flow of farms and agri-food SMEs are imperative to ensure their economic survival during this new crisis, which comes on the heels of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- However, the EAFRD budget is already covering existing financing needs and mid- and long-term commitments; it should not be used to finance emergency measures. However, as some EU countries have already used up or committed their funds under the EAFRD, the EESC considers that the European Commission should set up another source of funding outside the common agricultural policy (CAP) budget, so that this measure can be implemented without limiting EAFRD funds in the coming years.
- Furthermore, in view of the exceptional circumstances of the present situation and the need for a swift response, the Committee considers that the Commission should reduce the timeframe for paying out the aid and simplify the eligibility criteria for beneficiaries.
Downloads
Recommended for you
EU Fund for cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:welcomes the Commission’s desire to simplify and to ensure more flexibility, but believes that the simplification provided for requires concrete guarantees in order for it to be…
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund / Ukraine
Opinion
Since the Committee endorses the content of the European Commission proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 569th plenary session of 18 and 19 May 2022 to issue…
Ex-post evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund 2014-2020
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:believes that both the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund (CF) should also focus on increasing access to reskilling and upskilling as well as on developing economic growth opportunities…
The role of youth in rural development
Opinion
Key points The EESC: calls for holistic and cross-sectoral approaches to address challenges present in rural areas, such as depopulation, inadequate services, and obstacles to personal and…
Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund
Opinion
Key pointsThe EESC:stresses that the need to reduce regional and territorial disparities remains one of the key priorities of EU integration and that the use of traditional, proven and effective…