EESC info

In a plenary debate on the future of EU trade policy in a changing global reality, the EESC stressed that open, fair, inclusive and sustainable trade was the only trade that would deliver a resilient recovery and bring prosperity to business and people. It also acknowledged the key role of the World Trade Organisation in this effort.

The global trade picture shows that recovery remains heterogeneous.

The EESC president, Christa Schweng, commented: "International trade should be free, fair, sustainable and predictable. It's vital for our business and people. Sustainable trade is the only trade that will deliver a resilient and sustainable recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic".

At its October plenary session, the EESC hosted Ambassador Jean-Marie Paugam, Deputy Director-General of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), who was positive that the international trading system had proven its resilience in the face of the pandemic. "At the start, we witnessed a proliferation of restrictive measures to trade, but quite quickly states chose the path of cooperation and facilitation".

In the own-initiative opinion Next Generation Trade and Sustainable Development-Reviewing the 15-point action plan, linked with the debate, the EESC aims to ensure that this time the message for a "values-based trade agenda" is clearly set out as an integral part of the EU Trade strategy.

The rapporteur of the opinion, Tanja Buzek, specifically underlined that labour and environmental chapters were not living up fully to their legally binding commitments. "We propose an ambitious review, featuring a revamped sanctionable enforcement approach with stronger civil society monitoring, using innovative instruments and enhancing the leverage for trade and sustainable development chapters (TSD)".

Mr Paugam set as a priority the restoration of confidence in the system, which had been undermined by many stakeholders and states for a long time. "What we must rebuild is first of all the minimum level of trust, as without it, no negotiation can take place", adding emphatically that the most precious asset at the WTO was "non aes sed fides", not money but trust.

Based on a recently published article in Borderlex by David Henig and his three possible scenarios for the WTO, "revival, disintegration or regression", Mr Paugam chose "reconstruction". Therefore, the EU and European Civil Society should be actively involved because, as Ms Buzek put it, "There is no sustainability without civil society".

Concluding the event, Ms Schweng said: "The active involvement and buy-in from organised civil society, in all its components, is a core element of a sustainable trading system that delivers for people". (at)

The European Economic and Social Committee has welcomed the new EU strategy for the future of the Schengen area put forward by the European Commission. However, it has warned that the EU and Member States are obliged to uphold the Charter of Fundamental Rights with regard to the management of EU and national borders, police and judicial cooperation and migration and asylum policies.

Its call for action in the opinion on the new strategy, adopted at its October plenary session, comes after worrisome reports of fundamental rights violations at the EU's external borders, which the EESC finds extremely concerning.

"We are asking the European Commission and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency to monitor and fix these worrying issues and to follow up on reports of fundamental rights violations without delay," said the rapporteur for the opinion, Ionuţ Sibian.

The EESC noted that in recent years, the Schengen area has faced some tough challenges to its consistent application. The 2015 refugee crisis exposed shortcomings in the EU's approach to managing external borders and migration, while the COVID-19 pandemic prompted temporary reinstatements of internal borders. Disruptions to the Schengen area have harmed businesses, workers, border communities and cross-border cooperation.

The EESC stressed that the Commission should regularly and carefully monitor and assess the need for and extent of these reinstatements, taking action when needed.

In the opinion, the Committee also urged the Council to take swift action to end the continued exclusion of Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania from the full application of the Schengen Treaty.

"People in Cyprus, Romania, Bulgaria and Croatia still do not fully enjoy their rights as EU citizens as they are excluded from the Schengen area. The EESC supports their inclusion. These countries are keen to take part, and Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania already control their external borders in line with the Schengen Borders Code," said Mr Sibian.

The EESC strongly supports updating the Schengen Borders Code to include the lessons learned from the pandemic. It also calls for the strengthening of the Consultative Forum on Fundamental Rights and the involvement of organised civil society via the EESC. (ll)

How to best ensure the strategic autonomy of Europe's industry was the focus of a debate on industrial policy at the EESC October plenary.

The EESC plenary on 21 October hosted a debate with Padmashree Gehl Sampath, Berkman Klein Fellow at Harvard University, on how industrial strategy can support the twin transition to a green and digital economy, contribute to Europe's recovery and increase its strategic autonomy and resilience.

A leading expert on technology, development and the global political economy, Padmashree Gehl Sampath made the case for a new type of public intervention that does not just focus on fixing market failures, but directs technological change in socially productive directions.

"It is time to rethink industrial policy bold and out of the box", she said. "We should not repeat what did not work in the past."

The first step in designing this new industrial policy should be to recognise that the decline in entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness witnessed in advanced economies is constantly reinforced by new technological paradigms and trends across a multitude of sectors and processes. Uncertainty in the post-COVID world is not just a result of the pandemic.  It also ricochets the multiple effects of data-driven networks, the unfair spread of digitalisation dividends over the last 15 years, the pressure of climate change and the energy transition on countries, and the slowdown - even breakdown at times - of global trade and supply chains that have been carefully built since the onset of globalisation in the 1980s.

The second step would be to build a new strategy based on three bold propositions:

1) Acknowledging that there is a greater interconnectedness between the three mega trends of the future – health care/pandemic preparedness, energy transition/climate action and the data economy - and leveraging it. We do not need an industrial policy that prioritises these megatrends simultaneously on different tracks, but one that considers these transformations in a circular model of change.

2) Favouring dynamism in the technology sector by focusing on market retention and market performance, which is a more crucial issue than market entry in all these key sectors, especially in the pharmaceuticals and vaccine sector, where there are currently strong oligopolistic trends.
 
3) Adopting a real sectoral approach to industrial policy, moving beyond common goalposts such as competition policy because, although all these sectors are high-tech, R&D intensive and depend on innovation and rewards, they have completely different characteristics.

For instance, asked Ms. Gehl Sampath, if we really want to promote a healthcare market in Europe based on existing strengths, can the EU support a public purpose programme for a health industry ecosystem of the kind Operation Warp Speed created in the US in the immediate aftermath of COVID? Can Europe facilitate the scale-up of the strengths of its existing biotech firms in similar kinds of public investment programmes that facilitate product development?

Industrial strategy has been a major focus of the EESC's work in recent times. A series of webinars is underway to look at the stress points for today's industry. Entitled The path to our industrial future, the series will wind up in a major conference in March 2022 where the EESC will debate its findings with the French presidency of the EU and the European Commission. (dm)

The conference on Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law held by the European Economic and Social Committee brought into light serious violations and negative trends in the four areas covered by the European Rule of Law Mechanism (justice, corruption, media, and checks and balances). The EESC stressed that civil society is a dynamic actor in defending this fundamental principle of the EU.

The president of the EESC's FRRL Group, Cristian Pîrvulescu, underlined the role of civil society: "We do not turn to the representatives of civil society for the 'sake of the principle', we listen to civil society because its contribution is essential to these crucial issues".

Giulia Barbucci, EESC Vice-President, stated that "EU legal and political responses cannot stand alone. We must also better engage civil society actors as they are the bridge between the expectations of the general population and institutions".

However, the current health crisis and measures taken by authorities have amplified the challenges already existing in this field. The Commission's July 2021 Rule of Law Report has highlighted these negative trends, but also some positive developments in certain Member States.

Gašper Dovžan, State Secretary of Foreign Affairs in Slovenia, added that "respect for the rule of law should never be subjected to a dilemma or become a victim of any crisis."

Nevertheless, "there is still a lot to be done and a long way to go" as Matthew Caruana Galizia said. His mother, Daphne Caruana Galizia, a Maltese journalist, was murdered while investigating corruption, money laundering and organised crime. "My mother is unfortunately a good example of how failings in the rule of law and widespread corruption are not victimless crimes."

There was agreement among the participants that the rule of law was vital for the functioning of the EU as a whole, including its credibility, resilience and mutual trust.

As Debbie Kohner from the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions summed up, all four pillars covered by the European Rule of Law Mechanism – justice system, media freedom and pluralism, anti-corruption frameworks, and other checks and balances – are intertwined.

Nicole Romain from the EU Fundamental Rights Agency also stressed that all institutional actors should make better efforts to communicate fundamental rights and the rule of law to the general population.

Eszter Nagy from the European Federalists insisted that it was high time for the EU to make full use of all its tools, starting with rule of law budget conditionality. (at)

The implementation of National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs) in most EU Member States needs clarified governance systems. The distribution of responsibilities between central, regional and local levels is still unclear. The EESC is sounding the alarm and, in its opinion on the Annual Sustainable Growth Strategy 2021,adopted at its October plenary session and drawn up by Gonçalo Lobo Xavier, stresses that the mechanisms for involving civil society organisations and social partners in the implementation, monitoring and adjustment phases of the NRRPs need more clarity.

The EESC had already flagged up this issue in its February resolution, but the situation remains unchanged despite the European Commission's efforts. The EESC therefore strongly calls for more scrutiny of these crucial aspects of the EU's recovery.

"We draw attention to the need to measure progress in implementing the National Recovery and Resilience Plans. We need good monitoring indicators, as they are essential for setting the course of the EU's future development and recovery. Member States have to respond properly to this challenge: we need courage to make citizens aware of the huge difficulties ahead," said Mr Lobo Xavier, during the debate.

In the opinion on the Euro area economic policy 2021 drafted by Kristi Sõber, the EESC also points out that the pandemic is not over and the economic repercussions will be felt for several years. A specific and new emergency economic policy mix is therefore needed. The EU and euro area economies are once again growing quickly. At the same time, however, the EU is going through the most challenging period in the economic history of European integration. At this critical juncture, only government expenditure can help alleviate the situation.

The EESC appreciates the swift reaction at EU and national level to counter the pandemic and welcomes the fact that joint efforts have become a substantial part of the recovery strategy. Speaking at the plenary, Ms Sõber said: "Especially in the first half of 2020, the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiatives helped alleviate the very difficult economic circumstances, mainly by stabilising markets, jobs and personal incomes. This first step was followed by NextGenerationEU (NGEU), the robust and highly innovative fiscal contribution. Both initiatives were a quick and flexible response to the pandemic." (mp)

European Commission should move forward in the process of assessing the multi-sectoral impact of new 5G and 6G technologies. Tools and measures are needed to address risks and vulnerabilities. In the opinion drafted by Dumitru Fornea and adopted by the assembly in the October plenary session, the EESC takes a firm stand, and notes that social, health and environmental issues need to be examined, involving citizens and all relevant actors, in spite of the fact that the debate on the deployment of 5G networks has turned into a controversial, political discussion.

Speaking on the sidelines of the plenary, Mr Fornea said: "Rapid digitisation and development of electronic communications has a strong impact on the economy and society at large. Through the responsible use of these technologies, humanity has a historic chance to build a better society. Nevertheless, without due diligence and democratic control, our communities might face serious challenges in the administration of these technological systems in the future."

The pandemic has shown that electronic communications infrastructure plays an important role in society and can greatly improve citizens' quality of life, with a direct impact on fighting poverty. However, potential danger needs to be continuously assessed. For this reason, the EESC recommends allocating European and national funds to more in-depth, multidisciplinary research and impact studies focused on both humans and the environment, and to disseminating these results in order to educate the public and decision-makers. (mp)

The European Commission's new initiative to speed up the growth of a market for sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) is a step in the right direction, but some modifications are needed to ensure that it can be implemented effectively, without creating distortions. This is the key message of the opinion on the RefuelEU Aviation proposal, drafted by Thomas Kropp and adopted at the October plenary.

"It is indeed true that sustainable aviation fuels – if produced in sufficient quantities and available to all airlines – would significantly reduce the sector's CO₂ emissions. However, it is not clear whether the approach pursued by the Commission would prevent distortions to competition," said Mr Kropp.

Aviation is an international service sector and covers two distinct markets with different market dynamics: the EEA Single European Market on the one hand and, on the other, the internationally regulated market. The Commission's draft proposal should clearly reflect this difference and aim to maintain a level playing field within the EEA, while proactively and globally promoting applicable standards for sustainability.

On the issue of CO₂ emissions, Mr Kropp has drawn up an opinion on the Notification on the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), which was also adopted at the October plenary. In the document, the EESC endorses the Commission's proposal to amend Directive 2003/87/EC with respect to the notification of offsetting in 2021, supporting its urgent adoption in order to achieve legal certainty. (mp)

Recent events caused by COVID-19, extreme weather due to climate disruption, cyber-attacks and Brexit demonstrate the need to rethink priorities and improve the resilience and sustainability of EU food systems by reinforcing its autonomy. Food security is not a given for many EU citizens.

In the EESC's view, it is critical to develop a toolbox that includes risk management measures to help food supply chains deal with extreme situations, allowing authorities, farmers and industry to take immediate action.

The EESC, in its own-initiative opinion on Strategic Autonomy and Food Security and Sustainability, proposes a definition of open strategic autonomy applied to food systems based on food production, workforce and fair trade, with the overarching aim of ensuring food security and sustainability for all EU citizens through a fair, healthy, sustainable and resilient food supply chain.

"Farms and fertile agricultural land and water are strategic assets and must be protected across the EU: they constitute the backbone of our open strategic food autonomy", stressed the EESC rapporteur for this opinion, Klaas Johan Osinga. (mr)

EESC is calling on policy-makers to implement a comprehensive and holistic strategy for balanced, cohesive, equitable and sustainable rural and urban development. This will involve harnessing the role of local communities, boosting traditional industries and creating new economic activities and job opportunities in rural areas, while fostering synergies with urban areas.

The EESC opinion Towards a holistic strategy on sustainable rural/urban development makes several recommendations, based on multi-stakeholder involvement and a "bottom-up" approach, which are key ingredients for ensuring sustainability and local ownership of rural policies.

"It is essential to move towards an integrated approach to action and funding in the various policies that have an impact on rural areas. It is necessary to ensure that rural areas are not only sustainable but also attractive places to live. The quality of life in the rural world will be measured by the increase in the number of young people and new initiatives that provide quality, well-paid jobs", pointed out rapporteur Josep Puxeu Rocamora. (mr)

The EU fiscal framework needs to be revised. This must be done not only to stabilise the economy in the medium term, but also to finance the socio-ecological transformation of our economy and guarantee full employment, high-quality jobs and just transitions. The opinion drafted by Dominika Biegon and adopted by the assembly at the October plenary session is clear: the European Commission must press on with revising the EU economic governance framework.

Speaking during the debate, Ms Biegon said: "The EESC advocates pragmatic solutions for the future of the EU fiscal framework: our opinion shows how ideological divides in the debate on sovereign debts can be overcome. EU fiscal rules can be significantly improved without changing the EU Treaties. We can end the chronic lack of public investment and give Member States more leeway to counter economic downturns adequately in the future without endangering fiscal sustainability. The EU institutions should lose no time in proposing reforms to pave the way for sustainable recovery and a just transition."

Civil society organisations must also be more involved in the European Semester at both national and EU level. The partnership principle, which has long been a tradition in the governance of the European Structural and Investments Funds, should serve as a blueprint for effectively involving civil society. (mp)

In an own-initiative opinion adopted at the October plenary, the EESC set out measures for advertising to adapt to the challenges of climate change and the post-pandemic recovery while continuing to play its important role in Europe’s economy and culture.

The European Economic and Social Committee recommends a framework for a modern advertising industry that maintains a fundamental role in economic growth, job creation and support for Europe’s culture while becoming a trustworthy lever for responsible consumption.

According to various studies, every euro spent on advertising generates a 5 to 7 times greater boost to Europe’s economy. New products and services are spread, competition expands and public access to media, arts and sport is funded. But at the same time, the industry is often criticised for promoting overconsumption and for negative impacts on society and the environment.

“We are trying to explore the way this sector should evolve so that it remains efficient but at the same time ensures that its development is compatible with sustainable development,” explains Thierry Libaert, rapporteur of the opinion.

First, the EESC calls on businesses and agencies to debate how to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030 and to be carbon neutral by 2050.

Sustainability should be incorporated into every promotional campaign. In practical terms, advertising operators could be encouraged to reduce the energy consumption of digital billboards or make them more recyclable. To limit the environmental impacts of printed publicity, businesses could shift to PEFC- and FSC-labelled paper from sustainably managed forests and to low-toxicity inks complying with EU REACH and GreenGuard standards.

Advertising practices can also “nudge” consumers into reducing their collective environmental footprint. For example, advertisements could encourage car sharing by showing fewer drivers alone in their cars. Good practice should be reinforced by a stronger focus on environmental issues in university courses for communication professions.

Another overdue discussion is on unrealistic representations, such as harmful single-use products being presented as “sustainable”. In fact, a 2020 study by national consumer authorities and the European Commission found that 42% of “green” product claims on company websites were untrue or exaggerated.

A wider consensus among the advertising community to provide factual, accurate information would empower more consumers to identify products with genuinely reduced environmental impacts, argues the EESC. Here the European Commission has a role in working towards EU-wide regulation that supports the advertising industry in its fight against disinformation.

The approach should also provide incentives for advertisers who hold themselves accountable to these standards. Support would reduce the risk of advertisers migrating to the foreign tech companies that control much of digital advertising systems and strengthen an industry that remains central to Europe’s transition to more sustainable consumption. (dm)

 

A post-pandemic industrial strategy to ensure a strong recovery must include civil society, stresses the EESC in a recent report on the draft new EU industrial strategy. It must focus on sustainability and wellbeing, measure social impacts and promote an efficient, accessible healthcare system.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed weaknesses in Europe’s economic landscape, notably regional inequalities, skills gaps and risks to the single market and supplies of strategic goods. In the light of these lessons, the European Commission has updated its blueprint for a greener, more digital and competitive industrial landscape, the New Industrial Strategy for Europe.

The EESC has drawn up a report on the updates and a supplementary opinion highlighting the conditions for an inclusive and innovative healthcare ecosystem that can underpin industry in the EU.

In the report, the EESC calls for all groups involved in Europe’s economy to shape its future, from trade unions, industry and SMEs to other civil society organisations and public authorities. The current strategy focuses on business, but it is imperative to include the insights of social partners in designing the goals, targets and indicators needed for successful change, the EESC argues. It adds that competitiveness cannot be the only indicator of a viable long-term strategy. A broader set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) is needed than in the proposed Strategy. Competitiveness and investment are not enough, the EESC believes. KPIs must also promote social wellbeing and sustainable growth if Europe’s industries are to be truly sustainable.

Important areas to measure are the impacts of working and production conditions on both society and the environment, as well as the quality of jobs.

Another set of indictors should assess the shift to a “no-waste” circular economy. Finally, factors that cut across all industries, like R&D investment, should also be monitored to ensure that companies and jobs have long lifespans.

Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) are EU-wide projects that support the development of innovations crucial to the green and digital transitions. The EESC argues that first, the know-how of workers’ organisations is needed to implement these projects well. Second, IPCEIs must be assessed for the value and jobs they create and for the skills workers and businesses need for the modernised industries.

Standards are another important instrument to re-establish European leadership in industrial production. The Committee insists that the standards developed by European companies should not just be spread by companies themselves: the Commission should be behind them and help disseminate them too.

The supplementary opinion looks at how to the strategy could improve access to fairer and better coordinated healthcare in Europe.

The EESC recommends a focus on governance, diversification of supply and digital healthcare, which are all connected. Better-run businesses would allow the single market to operate more smoothly, fostering new businesses. In turn, an increased number of producers would make access to healthcare goods and services more reliable, as would incentives to bring manufacturing of essential materials and products back to Europe.

Measures to enable digital healthcare systems that work between organisations and across borders would further strengthen the single market for the industry and improve care. For the same reasons, the EESC calls for action to boost synergies between public and private sectors, large companies and SMEs and investments in R&D and training of all workers connected to healthcare. (dm)

Adding to the dialogue on the transition towards a climate-neutral society, the European Economic and Social Committee has called for more action to be taken to protect the European glass industry.

The EESC is asking EU policymakers to put the glass sector at the heart of current policy priorities such as the "Fit for 55" package, the Circular Economy Package, the Digital Agenda, the strategic value chains agenda and the EU's international trade policy and associated instruments.

The EESC has welcomed the EU policies that support the glass industry in order to enable the transition towards a climate-neutral society. It sees the EU's Renovation Wave as a tremendous source of business opportunities for glass, triggering investments while contributing enormously to the reduction of CO₂ emissions from buildings. However, the EESC has strongly recommended that an energy transition also take place within the glass sector, which should receive financial support for both capital and operational expenditure and should not be exposed to unfair competition from outside the EU market.

In its own-initiative opinion on the subject, adopted at its October plenary session, the EESC calls for multiple parallel actions to deliver a greener, energy-efficient glass industry, while enhancing competitiveness and maintaining quality jobs.

"Glass is everywhere, from mobility to construction, from defence to smartphones. To fully tap the potential of the new glass market while living up to the challenges of the green and digital transitions, the EU needs an industrial strategy for glass", said the opinion rapporteur, Aurel Laurenţiu Plosceanu.

The EESC calls on the Commission and the Parliament to develop new EU policies regarding climate goals and strategic value chains in order to restart the production of photovoltaic cells in Europe and safeguard the production of other strategic glass products and the related value chains.

The EESC noted that the EU glass industry is at a crossroads. On the one hand, glass has to cope with the structural transformations accompanying the digital and green transitions. Production will have to become carbon neutral and circular in three decades, while processes will be even more automated and digital in the coming years.

On the other hand, glass will be at the forefront of those transitions and there will be new business opportunities for many glass products in the coming years.

"The EU should classify glass as a permanent material and should recognise its benefits in contributing to sustainable packaging systems and circular economy principles. There is great potential to create new jobs in the glass recycling sector, and to attract new talented workers,'' said Gerald Kreuzer, co-rapporteur for the opinion.

The EESC therefore urges the EU to recognise that glass is vital for the production of green energy. (ks)

The European Economic and Social Committee has expressed some reservations about the Commission's recent proposal on introducing blended learning - traditional teacher-led learning combined with online or other independent work – in primary and secondary education, questioning its timeliness given how greatly the COVID-19 pandemic has affected education systems in Europe and elsewhere.

In the opinion on blended learning adopted at its October plenary session, the EESC also raised concerns about the suitability of this mode of learning for primary and early secondary school students, arguing that it should first be introduced in higher grades, as younger children, especially those in the early primary years, are generally not mature enough to learn independently.

"We doubt that this is the right time to introduce or push to have blended learning in schools. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a huge impact on education systems and children, especially young children who had only just started their schooling experience. Blended learning includes learning independently and that requires certain skills," said the rapporteur for the opinion, Tatjana Babrauskienė.

The EESC said it acknowledged that blended learning can improve access to education, training and digital skills, as seen during the COVID-19 crisis.

However, the pandemic also showed that some students lack the resources – practical or personal – to learn in this way, which in the worst cases might lead them to drop out of school. In addition, it showed that education involving close contact with peers is essential for children's socialisation and mental health.

"We cannot underestimate the value of the social role of education. It is not just about science, physics or maths: it is about children going to school together, mixing, meeting their peers. It's a matter of physical education and mental health,” said the co-rapporteur, Michael McLoughlin.

The EESC has made 21 recommendations on how to ensure that blended learning can have a positive role in education. One major point is that it should be implemented and funded to enhance education and training for all students, with particular focus on those from lower-income backgrounds, with disabilities and in rural areas.

During the COVID-19 crisis, it became apparent that blended learning demands considerable time and creativity from already overstretched teachers who are central to the successful design and supervision of independent learning.  

There are already not enough teachers in Europe, partly due to pay and difficult working conditions. It is therefore important to monitor blended-learning's impacts on conditions and workloads to avoid burnouts. To mitigate pressure, the EESC calls on national authorities to support teachers as they train for this new method of learning. (ll)

The excessive mortality rates during this pandemic crisis have revealed structural and systemic problems in the nursing home care model. In addition, the rise in life expectancy and the consequent increase in the number of older persons in the years to come point to the need to reform the care model.

How to guarantee improved accessibility, affordability and quality of care, as well as an adequate number of care workers with improved working conditions, are among the key challenges identified during the EESC hearing "Towards a new care model for the elderly: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic".  Input from this hearing will feed into an own-initiative opinion the Committee is preparing on the topic.

The rapporteur of the opinion, Miguel Ángel Cabra de Luna, said: "this opinion is not meant to be a comprehensive approach to ageing, but to focus on the issue of care for older people as they have been the most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic".

During the hearing, healthcare models from Member States were presented, showcasing the different approaches and difficulties due to the pandemic.

According to the 2021 long-term care report prepared by the Commission and the Social Protection Committee, population ageing is expected to lead to a clear increase in demand for long-term care. The number of people aged 65 or over is projected to rise by 41%, to 130.1 million over the next 30 years.

Maciej Kucharczyk, secretary-general of the AGE Platform Europe, said: "developing good care systems is an opportunity and services are the means to support people's autonomy, independence and quality of life".

Tuscany Bell, from the European Public Service Union (EPSU), said: "in order to provide an adequate service for people in need of care, we need appropriate working conditions and a sufficient level of qualified personnel. Actually, an insufficient number of care workers care for too many people".

As active ageing has a crosscutting nature and touches upon economic and social policies, coordination between social and health services is needed, making LTC more accessible, allowing older people to enjoy a life of dignity. (at)

The Connecting EU 2021 seminar in Lisbon is over. For the fourteenth time, we met with communications experts from organised civil society and press officers to talk about the Europe we dream of. Now it is time to make the dream of a strong, safe, secure, fair, inclusive, hopeful Europe a reality.

We would like to thank all our guests, speakers, moderators, journalists, EESC members, colleagues and friends for this busy, creative time in enchanting Lisbon. We can all be proud of our joint success.
Let us stay in touch, and stay connected.

EESC Press Unit team